X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fhuman-diversity-notes.md;h=f91ffac5ed383aef6daa73db7d5150c0f87f0771;hp=1ea8133a476fef30d833dfb9b98c168fe17c2be3;hb=a0299cd76ffe87550d6c4fc0394f0e5d3b737087;hpb=40672f93bc319ed7591ca76fdf4444f397702d99

diff --git a/notes/human-diversity-notes.md b/notes/human-diversity-notes.md
index 1ea8133..f91ffac 100644
--- a/notes/human-diversity-notes.md
+++ b/notes/human-diversity-notes.md
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ Eugenics
 
 Footnote 4 to the introduction of Part III recaps the argument. If the black/white IQ gap in the U.S. were caused by racism, you'd predict that blacks would have higher IQs in countries where they're the ruling majority, like in Haiti or most of sub-Saharan Africa, but they don't. You might think racism affects IQ by means of its affect on socioeconomic status (SES), but adjusting for parental SES only diminishes the gap by a third. 
 
+Flynn effect, measurement invariance
+
 You might think that the tests are culturally biased, but if that were true, you'd expect the distortion
 
 (And on the hereditarian model, parental SES could be caused by parental cognitive abilities.)
@@ -51,11 +53,9 @@ Cognitive Enhancement and Network Effects: https://link.springer.com/article/10.
 
 https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/y4bkJTtG3s5d6v36k/stupidity-and-dishonesty-explain-each-other-away
 
-
 https://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/10/james-watson-tells-inconvenient-truth_296.php
 
-
-Clueless [presentist](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentism_(literary_and_historical_analysis)) conservatism of the form, "Old-timey patriarchy and white supremacy were Really Bad, but that's over and everything is Fine Now" is unlikely to satisfy those who _don't_ think everything is Fine Now, 
+afraid of seeming too flippant to readers who haven't decoverted yet; my own deconversion event is too far in my past
 
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Chesterton%27s_fence
 https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/wyyfFfaRar2jEdeQK/entangled-truths-contagious-lies
@@ -66,9 +66,8 @@ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/faHbrHuPziFH7Ef7p/why-are-individual-iq-differen
 
 [claim to be non-disprovable](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/fAuWLS7RKWD2npBFR/religion-s-claim-to-be-non-disprovable)
 
-> Above all, nothing we learn will threaten human equality properly understood.
+https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dHQkDNMhj692ayx78/avoiding-your-belief-s-real-weak-points
 
-Murray quotes Stephen Pinker: "Equality is not the empirical claim that all groups of humans are interchangeable; it is the moral principle that individuals should not be judged or constrained by the average properties of their group."
 
 [where I agree with the moral _sentiment_, but that platitude doesn't solve all the problems (notably, that's not how Bayesian reasoning works)]