X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fi-tell-myself-notes.txt;h=59c2053eb9b5877183de4fc67ad7c98339dbbd9e;hp=393ed8edf5fcdde2c3ba23247ede156296fe4915;hb=cba2d0e6564524af1ee7b1f038fd433f55b56e66;hpb=55baaffd81b3308f101b2aec1e277402ab3adab8

diff --git a/notes/i-tell-myself-notes.txt b/notes/i-tell-myself-notes.txt
index 393ed8e..59c2053 100644
--- a/notes/i-tell-myself-notes.txt
+++ b/notes/i-tell-myself-notes.txt
@@ -517,10 +517,12 @@ I think if the so-called "rationality" community is going to not be FRAUDULENT,
 
 I'm grateful to [...] for actually helping me, but I feel incredibly betrayed that Scott is playing dumb about philosophy (and doesn't want to talk to our coalition anymore), Eliezer will PRIVATELY admit that he has no objections to my philosophy arguments but is playing dumb about how the things he said in public were incredibly misleading (and doesn't want to talk to our coalition anymore). I have more conversation-bandwidth with Anna because I've been friends with her for 10 years, but Anna doesn't believe in free speech; she'll privately sympathize that it's bad that we're in a situation where political factors are interfering with being able to have an honest public conversation about philosophy, but
 
-
+> "friendship, supplication and economics"
 
 This whole multi-year drama _should_ have been a three-comment conversation. If we were _actually trying_ to do the systematically-correct-reasoning thing
 
 Random Commenter: Hey, that can't be right—we had a whole Sequence about 
 
 Robot cult leaders: 
+
+> "Those who are savvy in high-corruption equilibria maintain the delusion that high corruption is common knowledge, to justify expropriating those who naively don't play along, by narratizing them as already knowing and therefore intentionally attacking people, rather than being lied to and confused."