X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fnotes.txt;h=07bd15b24651ea8c846d4033a929a241817298bf;hp=81b6944a8c0daf39c71704e166a4c4e397ef8bb1;hb=544ebe0fcfd95aa1b081cbb3fadfcc4908e7ad79;hpb=545b180f87cb2b2f9b15aaee62f48f173e7843f2

diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt
index 81b6944..07bd15b 100644
--- a/notes/notes.txt
+++ b/notes/notes.txt
@@ -3305,3 +3305,6 @@ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-022-02482-6
 I agree that people who have prior reasons to be skeptical of survey evidence should be upfront about those reasons, rather than opportunistically objecting to particular questions when that's not their [true rejection](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/TGux5Fhcd7GmTfNGC/is-that-your-true-rejection).
 
 https://unherd.com/thepost/calls-for-violence-in-the-trans-debate-only-come-from-one-side/
+
+Blanchard: "What I think is that people are born with predispositions or vulnerabilities to a kind of erotic miss-learning" quoted in https://since2010.substack.com/p/is-autogynephilia-innate
+