X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fnotes.txt;h=3bc2606cb819a6fc02a71da308d1ec8afbd68260;hp=7b4f87b39a3ea8175751c5e253c1e26a564428b8;hb=5a649d1219f6ccaf37c07678d4bfd5fb4a94478e;hpb=ba79d5b81bee4720799938e4eab6fa7f730c510c

diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt
index 7b4f87b..3bc2606 100644
--- a/notes/notes.txt
+++ b/notes/notes.txt
@@ -1312,3 +1312,11 @@ who should be classified as having the Bad Man property and therefore be exclude
 
 
  thanks for the marketing advice! I should _definitely_ take that into account if I ever decide to put more effort into \"persuading people\", which sounds like something that an aspiring instrumental rationalist would care about. Perhaps unfortunately, however, I'm an aspiring epistemic rationalist: all I can do is try to communicate what I actually think and feel using clear language (and standard rhetorical techniques like sarcasm, satire, &c. that people know how to interpret even if they wouldn't be clear if someone na\u00c3\u00afvely took the words literally). If other people aren't persuaded by this ... maybe they _shouldn't_ be! Maybe I can live with that!"
+
+
+I _really, really_ don't want to participate in an oppression Olympics; I think it would be _really really bad_ to try to settle social-norms disputes with a competition to see which coalition can rack up more probabilistic suicides. (Just think about what incentives that creates!) But for the people who _are_ going to make decisions on the basis of probabilistic suicides _anyway_, surely my suffering deserves to be counted, too?
+
+True male side/true female side: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FBgozHEv7J72NCEPB/my-way#AEZaakdcqySmKMJYj
+
+policing: "we definitely expect better models of gender out of you": https://twitter.com/atax1a/status/1157066530028265473
+