X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fnotes.txt;h=74c7ad08d94b05595bce166655de378050841c93;hp=ded97e285499e75faf32b44794399de4b79ca8a9;hb=bb9203e102e4456df500e11d1766aff6badac098;hpb=d44c0f306fb82e0d775053c1f659e88c4c7c88cd diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt index ded97e2..74c7ad0 100644 --- a/notes/notes.txt +++ b/notes/notes.txt @@ -2703,3 +2703,23 @@ https://transsubstantiation.com/a-letter-to-anne-lawrence-709fac0af75e > Someone recently likened AGP to the movie Get Out https://ovarit.com/o/ItsAFetish/35359/silicone-female-body-suit-links-to-amazon/fc473510-7d4a-4e11-af9c-7b7fadfdb551#comment-fc473510-7d4a-4e11-af9c-7b7fadfdb551 + +------ + +Can ... can I ask you a question about your beliefs? (Not to argue, but to understand; I wouldn't spend bandwidth asking if my Intellectual Turing Test procedure could predict what your reply, but I can't predict it.) + +I thought your position was (my attempted paraphrase—) "Gender is a social category; it's better to let people choose it freely rather than tying it to assigned sex at birth." + +But I'm having trouble reconciling that with the language of "now they think they might be a girl [...] Some people who think they might be a girl are really sure, and some aren't sure", which suggests there's a pre-existing underlying fact of the matter. + +If you believe it's a social category that people should be able to self-designate into, wouldn't you use language that describes it as a choice or preference rather than an underlying fact? That is, you'd say "aren't sure whether they _prefer_ to be a girl" rather than "aren't sure whether they _are_ a girl". + +------ + +"How Mainstream Trans Narratives are Harmful" +https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2RqxAasmH4 + +https://scarlettphoenix.substack.com/p/detransition-diary-1 + +"When Selves Have Sex: What the Phenomenology of Trans Sexuality Can Teach About Sexual Orientation" +https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00918369.2014.865472