X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fnotes.txt;h=c992e59128ed182529544067b7fcee8393bdd545;hp=c96a47ccc33100ad30dac56d67664886659be797;hb=87631e7e6d90ba6df5f9fda0458d2fad4a0dae64;hpb=fb618fd21d86fd878ceae32753233306ebcd0628

diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt
index c96a47c..c992e59 100644
--- a/notes/notes.txt
+++ b/notes/notes.txt
@@ -1243,3 +1243,9 @@ no transsexual is like 'from a young age all i ever wanted was to be.. cis'
 https://twitter.com/theorygurl/status/1062451652836446208
 
 https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/bhulic/i_cant_do_this_any_more_i_need_to_divorce_my/
+
+thanks for the marketing advice! I should _definitely_ take that into account if I ever decide to put more effort into "persuading people", which sounds like something that an aspiring instrumental rationalist would care about. Perhaps unfortunately, however, I'm an aspiring epistemic rationalist: all I can do is try to communicate what I actually think and feel using clear language (and standard rhetorical techniques like sarcasm, satire, &c. that people know how to interpret even if they wouldn't be clear if someone naïvely took the words literally). If other people aren't persuaded by this ... maybe they _shouldn't_ be! Maybe I can live with that!
+
+You _can't_ optimize your group's culture for not-talking-about-atheism without also optimizing against understanding Occam's razor; you _can't_ optimize for not questioning gender self-identity without also optimizing against understanding "A Human's Guide to Words."
+
+I guess I can't argue with that, but I wish I knew what happened to my wallet