X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fsexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-notes.md;h=f4cf289c23aeae2b20f4b29756aacddd0071a979;hp=87441ca11859ec86b3a990bae3b2210612a0c55c;hb=21019ecd6b84df9c88aec3ce96cae977a6014862;hpb=3753814a9f32139da8c5bf6f912a04cacad19681

diff --git a/notes/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-notes.md b/notes/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-notes.md
index 87441ca..f4cf289 100644
--- a/notes/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-notes.md
+++ b/notes/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-notes.md
@@ -6,8 +6,9 @@ Points to work in—
 https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jNAAZ9XNyt82CXosr/mirrors-and-paintings
 
 * explain the Singularity/paperclip terminology before use
- 
-* the literature talks about crossdressing a lot, but I mostly just fantasize; dress-up isn't really convincing
+* also "non-exclusively androphilic" / nonhomosexual terminology
+* the literature talks about crossdressing a lot, but I mostly just fantasize; dress-up isn't really convincing 
+* address misreporting
 
 * not a theory of trans men
 
@@ -42,7 +43,6 @@ What happens when every sensitive bookish male who thinks [it might be cool to b
 
 Anne Lawrence described autogynephiles as ["men who love women and want to become what they love."](/papers/lawrence-becoming_what_we_love.pdf) But it's worse than that. We're men who love what we _wish_ women were, and want to become _that_.
 
-
 * "The Opposite Sex" 
 
 * EY was right about "men need to think about themselves _as men_" (find cite)
@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/qCsxiojX7BSLuuBgQ/the-super-happy-people-3-8
 [TODO: my pseudobisexual moments (it's California in the year 2015)
 our analogues would make a good couple in a nearby alternate universe where at least one of us is female. "Exactly one," he said. "It's California in the year 2015," I said.]
 
-
 https://fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/
 
 "people who have sexual fetishes that can't possibly be realized using existing technology [...] like the guy who gets on by entropy decreasing in a closed system"
@@ -65,11 +64,6 @@ Normal straight men also have positive-valence thoughts about women when they're
 
 NYT hit piece https://archive.is/0Ghdl
 
-
-https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/sXHQ9R5tahiaXEZhR/algorithmic-intent-a-hansonian-generalized-anti-zombie
-https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Ndtb22KYBxpBsagpj/eliezer-yudkowsky-facts
-
-
 ------
 
 no safe defense https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/wustx45CPL5rZenuo/no-safe-defense-not-even-science
@@ -323,7 +317,7 @@ Perhaps so. But back in 2009, **we did not anticipate that _whether or not I sho
 
 **To be fair, it's not obvious that I _shouldn't_ cut my dick off!**
 
-I don't think I'm setting [my price for joining](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Q8evewZW5SeidLdbA/your-price-for-joining) particularly high here?
+
 
 [cruelty to ordinary people, optimized to confuse and intimidate people trying to use language to reason about the concept of biological sex]