X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fsexual-dimorphism-marketing.md;h=74883434d8572abd1cbad5eaebdd1b67040c0667;hp=cf25762a6149f4a59166292d6e6cee73000fa13b;hb=999a53e5494a23a3ad349c8b611ec0b5df226d58;hpb=beedd5f7101e33ddb009e5e8854778a23f0e7e95

diff --git a/notes/sexual-dimorphism-marketing.md b/notes/sexual-dimorphism-marketing.md
index cf25762..7488343 100644
--- a/notes/sexual-dimorphism-marketing.md
+++ b/notes/sexual-dimorphism-marketing.md
@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ But, it's actually looking like it's going to take closer to five years? I've do
 
 Here's Part 1 ([TODO] words), about my experiences (as seen through the interpretive lens of Yudkowskian philosophy): [TODO linky]
 
-Then Part 2 can cover the evidence and theory for why I think I'm justified in believing that a substantial majority of trans women are relevantly "like me", even though I don't have introspective access to other people's experiences.
+Then Part 2 can cover the evidence and theory for why I think I'm justified in believing that a substantial majority of trans women in Western countries are relevantly "like me", even though I don't have introspective access to other people's experiences. (Including going into the hidden Bayesan structure of what "relevantly 'like me'" is even supposed to mean—the sense in which a psychological theory can be "true".)
 
-Then Part 3 can cover my theory and retrospective on the political incentives driving the ASTONISHING cowardice, mendacity, and doublethink of everyone of significance in the so-called "rationalist" community on this issue—not just the empirical psychology question (which is perhaps forgiveable—psychology is hard!), but also the drop-dead basics of our OWN philosophy of language, which dispute was SO absurd and took SO much time and effort to correct even within the "community" that it would be COMICAL if it weren't for the whole "the entire future history of the universe depends on these motherfuckers thinking clearly" thing.
+Then Part 3 can cover my theory and retrospective on the political incentives driving the ASTONISHING cowardice, mendacity, and doublethink of everyone of significance in the so-called "rationalist" "community" on this issue—not just the empirical psychology question (which would be forgiveable—psychology is hard!), but also the drop-dead basics of their OWN philosophy of language, which dispute was SO absurd and took SO much time and effort to correct even within the "community" that it would be COMICAL if it weren't for the whole "the entire future history of the universe depends on these motherfuckers thinking clearly" thing.
 
 And then I'll be done and can move on with my life!!