projects / Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git / commit
? search:
summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
(parent: 2d4a7a5) | patch
Human Diversity review Presidential sprint session 3: univariate fallacy
authorM. Taylor Saotome-Westlake <ultimatelyuntruethought@gmail.com>
Tue, 18 Feb 2020 02:39:01 +0000 (18:39 -0800)
committerM. Taylor Saotome-Westlake <ultimatelyuntruethought@gmail.com>
Tue, 18 Feb 2020 02:39:01 +0000 (18:39 -0800)
commit00709ef6f24257a8ee71925ecccd551a1e802232
tree6a3aed10d301b1f6c0c91023e8250e5587c42609tree | snapshot
parent2d4a7a5a7494e4bd94afda33694f3a8595316b95commit | diff
Human Diversity review Presidential sprint session 3: univariate fallacy

Is it bad to treat a topic in passing when you still want to cover it
in more depth in a future post? (I wanted to work in the mathematics
of the "typical set" into this graf, but I didn't see how to make it
fit.) Maybe it's good.
content/2018/untitled-metablogging-26-december-2018.md diff | blob | history
content/drafts/book-review-human-diversity.md diff | blob | history
source for The Scintillating But Ultimately Untrue Thought