From: M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 03:48:42 +0000 (-0700) Subject: check in X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=f42d9732b3cbde16cd81eee3fd6550ceca0d4e2b check in --- diff --git a/content/drafts/peering-through-reverent-fingers.md b/content/drafts/peering-through-reverent-fingers.md index d1a2e60..32787c7 100644 --- a/content/drafts/peering-through-reverent-fingers.md +++ b/content/drafts/peering-through-reverent-fingers.md @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ The progressive _Zeitgeist_ does not even offer this respite. Getting over psych The original lie wasn't _invisible_ exactly, but it never caused too many problems, because it's easy to doublethink around: most of the functional use of sex categories in Society is handled by seamless subconscious reference-classing, without anyone needing to consciously, verbally reason about sex differences. +Give people photographs of + [height base rates] But in the ten years I had my back turned reading science books, my former quasi-religion somehow came up with _new_ lies: now, it's not enough to believe that women and men are mentally the same, you're also supposed to accept that those words refer to diff --git a/notes/critical_acclaim.md b/notes/critical_acclaim.md index 1942e75..448aadb 100644 --- a/notes/critical_acclaim.md +++ b/notes/critical_acclaim.md @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ explicit link: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheMotte/comments/bytvw2/culture_war_rou https://twitter.com/TomChivers/status/1204715688759365633 +https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/a6wmk3/a_request_for_new_blogs_to_read_some_sharing_of_a/ebyo45f/ + "often seem to have a fixation with categorization common among those on the autism spectrum." https://www.transgendermap.com/politics/sexology/autogynephilia/activists/ People liked the _Origins of Unfairness_ review— @@ -73,3 +75,8 @@ https://twitter.com/conmccashin/status/1226170284308344833 https://twitter.com/hgetson/status/1226068206349144065 https://twitter.com/KSpeicher/status/1225535875880300544 https://twitter.com/linton7119/status/1223621246304366594 + +Sneer Club! +https://www.reddit.com/r/SneerClub/comments/fw9cng/the_lgbt_activist_machinery_instead_adapted/ +https://www.reddit.com/r/SneerClub/comments/fw9cng/the_lgbt_activist_machinery_instead_adapted/fmpao3e/?context=3 +https://archive.is/bPPyk \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/notes/human-diversity-notes.md b/notes/human-diversity-notes.md index 6003116..79504b2 100644 --- a/notes/human-diversity-notes.md +++ b/notes/human-diversity-notes.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ * "genders have been identified" * Hyde/Fine binary notes: p. 388 * need to talk about individual differences being non-threatening +* need to define "cognitive repetioires" earlier because I mention it later +* work in "Can Race Be Erased" result "I realize I am writing in an LGBT era when some argue that 63 distinct genders have been identified," Murray writes at the beginning of Appendix 2. But this is failing to pass the [Ideological Turing Test](https://www.econlib.org/archives/2011/06/the_ideological.html). @@ -165,6 +167,8 @@ Draw-a-Horse Pueblo Thermometer and statistical discrimination in machine learning +Anacholic's critique: https://twitter.com/AnechoicMedia_/status/1245997689113907200 + ------ diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt index 653be34..15759ec 100644 --- a/notes/notes.txt +++ b/notes/notes.txt @@ -1747,6 +1747,15 @@ You're always going to be dominated by _someone's_ memeplex. The question is, if ---- +https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/dy7241/peak_trans_x_tell_your_story_here/fmg5eps/ + https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16488877 > independent of the masculinizing effects of gonadal secretions, XY and XX brain cells have different patterns of gene expression that influence their differentiation and function +Don't speak truth to power. Speak truth against your incentive gradient. I mean, _try_ to do that. You can't _literally_ do that, because you're _always_ following your incentive gradient, by definition. Speak truth against your _current model_ of your incentive gradient. + +---- + +Theorem: when you strike at a king, you must kill him. (Credit assignment: Ralph Waldo Emerson.) + +My restatement (yours may be different, but still): when you strike at the God-Empress—well, striking at the God-Empress wouldn't work. But when you strike at one of the God-Empress's minions, you have to either kill him or provide sufficiently strong evidence that you could kill him if you wanted. diff --git a/notes/post_ideas.txt b/notes/post_ideas.txt index 4211298..af3bf3b 100644 --- a/notes/post_ideas.txt +++ b/notes/post_ideas.txt @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ UUT— -X The Reverse Murray Rule X Teleology -_ Peering Through Reverent Fingers _ Book Review: Charles Murray's Human Diversity _ Hrunkner Unnerby and the Shallowness of Progress +_ Peering Through Reverent Fingers _ Reply to Ozymandias on Lesbians and on Single-Sex Spaces _ Elision _vs_. Choice (working title) -_ Travis's Trilemma: Creepy, Crazy, or Protected-Class +_ The Feeling Is Mutual +_ Travis's Trilemma: Creepy, Crazy, or Protected-Class (working title) _ Friendship Practices of the Secret-Sharing Plain Speech Valley Squirrels _ Phenotypic Identity and Memetic Capture _ Sexual Dimorphism, Yudkowsky's Sequences, and Me @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@ _ Selective Reporting and Clustering it's important to have language for psychology because you can't point to pictures +Vocabulary as Capital Investment + +B.F. being smart-but-dense + +how taxonomy/typology emerges from Bayesian networks + _ On Being Stereotyped Badly (working title) Angelic Irony