From 15ef16306310e34dd3700b0ac5449333684a5d37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake" Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 23:22:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] poke --- .../if-clarity-seems-like-death-to-them.md | 2 +- ...ved-social-control-mechanisms-and-rocks.md | 8 +++++-- content/drafts/standing-under-the-same-sky.md | 21 ++++++++++++++++++- notes/memoir-sections.md | 12 ++++++----- notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv | 5 ++++- 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/drafts/if-clarity-seems-like-death-to-them.md b/content/drafts/if-clarity-seems-like-death-to-them.md index 8556da2..b749c0b 100644 --- a/content/drafts/if-clarity-seems-like-death-to-them.md +++ b/content/drafts/if-clarity-seems-like-death-to-them.md @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ It could have been a comment instead of a top-level post, but I wanted to bid fo I had [an exchange with Scott Alexander in the comment section](https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/yaCwW8nPQeJknbCgf/free-speech-and-triskaidekaphobic-calculators-a-reply-to/comment/JdsknCuCuZMAo8EbP). -"I know a bunch of people in academia who do various verbal gymnastics to appease the triskaidekaphobics, and when you talk to them in private they get everything 100% right," [he said](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yaCwW8nPQeJknbCgf/free-speech-and-triskaidekaphobic-calculators-a-reply-to?commentId=mHrHTvzg8MGNH2CwB) (in a follow-up comment, on 5 January 2020). +"I know a bunch of people in academia who do various verbal gymnastics to appease the triskaidekaphobics, and when you talk to them in private they get everything 100% right," [he said](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yaCwW8nPQeJknbCgf/free-speech-and-triskaidekaphobic-calculators-a-reply-to?commentId=mHrHTvzg8MGNH2CwB) (in a follow-up comment on 5 January 2020). I'm happy for them, I replied, but I thought the _point_ of having taxpayer-funded academic departments was so that people who _aren't_ insider experts can have accurate information with which to inform decisions? diff --git a/content/drafts/people-evolved-social-control-mechanisms-and-rocks.md b/content/drafts/people-evolved-social-control-mechanisms-and-rocks.md index 6b8beb8..ca67690 100644 --- a/content/drafts/people-evolved-social-control-mechanisms-and-rocks.md +++ b/content/drafts/people-evolved-social-control-mechanisms-and-rocks.md @@ -40,9 +40,13 @@ He was a useful sounding board when I was frustrated with my so-far-mostly priva "[A]s long as you are resisting the dark linguistic power that the left is offering you," he said, with a smiley emoticon. -In some of my private discussions with others, Ozy Frantz (a.f.a.b. nonbinary author of _Thing of Things_) had been cited as a local authority figure on gender issues—someone asked what Ozy thought about the two-types theory, or wasn't persuaded because they were partially deferring to Ozy. I remarked to "Wilhelm" that this implied that my goal should be to overthrow Ozy (who I otherwise liked and respected) as _de facto_ rationalist gender czar. +In some of my private discussions with others, Ozy Frantz (a.f.a.b. nonbinary author of [_Thing of Things_](https://thingofthings.substack.com/)) had been cited as a local authority figure on gender issues—someone asked what Ozy thought about the two-types theory, or wasn't persuaded because they were partially deferring to Ozy.[^ozy-authority] I remarked to "Wilhelm" that this implied that my goal should be to overthrow Ozy (who I otherwise liked) as _de facto_ rationalist gender czar. -"Wilhelm" didn't think this was feasible. The problem, he explained, was that ""hypomasculine men are often broken people who idolize feminists, and worship the first one who throws a few bones of sympathy towards men". (He had been in this category, so he could make fun of them.) Thus, in feminist communities, the female person would win a priestly battle, regardless of quality of arguments. It wasn't Ozy's fault, really. She—"Wilhelm" used feminine pronouns for Ozy, although I always said _they_ in public—wasn't power-seeking; she just happened to fulfill preexisting demand for a feminist manic pixie dream girl intellectual slut confessor. +[^ozy-authority]: Although the fact that Ozy had [commented](https://thingofthings.wordpress.com/2016/07/13/on-autogynephilia/) [on](https://thingofthings.wordpress.com/2016/11/22/thoughts-on-the-blanchardbailey-distinction/) the theory at all—plausibly causally downstream from me yelling at everyone in private—was probably a net-positive for the cause; there's no bad publicity for new ideas. I got a couple of [reply](/2016/Oct/reply-to-ozy-on-agp/) [pieces](/2016/Nov/reply-to-ozy-on-two-type-mtf-taxonomy/) out of their engagement in the early months of this blog. + +"Wilhelm" didn't think this was feasible. The problem, he explained, was that "hypomasculine men are often broken people who idolize feminists, and worship the first one who throws a few bones of sympathy towards men". (He had been in this category, so he could make fun of them.) Thus, in feminist communities, the female person would win a priestly battle, regardless of quality of arguments. It wasn't Ozy's fault, really. She[^ozy-pronouns] wasn't power-seeking; she just happened to fulfill preexisting demand for a feminist manic pixie dream girl intellectual slut confessor. + +[^ozy-pronouns]: The feminine pronoun in this paragraph reflects the fact that "Wilhelm" and I used feminine pronouns for Ozy in our private messages. I don't misgender people _in public!_ But I do argue that public summaries of private conversations are not, technically, the same thing. I mentioned that there was a woman who had been hanging around the "rationalist"[^scare-quotes] community despite being mildly contemptuous of our disrespect for academic philosophy, who was very trigger-happy with sexism accusations, who I privately thought would be _less_ respected if she were a man making similar-quality arguments—but there was no way to give her feedback on the matter without alienating her. I supposed that in a NRx (_i.e._, evil) space, they would probably say, "who cares if you alienate the bitch". But she was a _woman paying attention to us_. diff --git a/content/drafts/standing-under-the-same-sky.md b/content/drafts/standing-under-the-same-sky.md index 99d5031..8d9fe7f 100644 --- a/content/drafts/standing-under-the-same-sky.md +++ b/content/drafts/standing-under-the-same-sky.md @@ -550,13 +550,32 @@ The thing I was trying to keep on Society's shared map was, Biological Sex Actua Lintamande said they agreed with these claims. Yudkowsky replied with a "+1" emoji. + +[TODO: Linta saying "intersex condition" was just semantics was emblematic of a disagreement-minimizing culture?] + [TODO: "like, if you just went and found Eliezer!2004 and were like 'hey, weird sci fi hypothetical' _speaking of the year 2004_; the thing I'm at war with is that I don't think he would _dare_ publish the same essay today + ... ] + +The 2004 mailing list post was almost _mocking_ the guy, for being so naïve, for not seeing the type mismatch between the deep structure of reality, and mentalistic fantasies vaguely gestured at with English words. + +And the 2016–2021 posts _couldn't even acknolwedge that Biological Sex Actually Exists_. Did Yudkowsky expect us not to _notice_?? Coming from anyone else in the world, I wouldn't have minded. But the _conjunction_ of these political games and the eliezera racial supremacy rhetoric was just _insulting_. + +April said she didn't think the "Changing Emotions" argument was making claims relevant to trans people. The only claim you really needed was that it was reasonable for cis men and trans men, and cis women and trans women, to be in the same category for the purposes of general social interaction; whether you would need post-Singularity tech to make a biological male indistinguishable from a cis woman had little bearing on what we should make of trans women. + +That was interesting. April's profile said she was 19 years old and transfeminine. + + [TODO: April saying that the essay wasn't making claims relevant to trans people; but _I_ thought it was relevant in 2008] -[TODO: someone said "the word in their language doesn't match the word in yours"; and got a +1 emoji; I resisted the temptation to say "So ... I can define a word any way I want"; I made a few more comments about kitchen knife deception (and let my friends talk me down from making more). I'm not worried about what he thinks about me anymore.] + +[TODO: bridge ...] + +[TODO: someone said "the word in their language doesn't match the word in yours"; and got a +1 emoji; I resisted the temptation to say "So ... I can define a word any way I want"; I call a killthread.] + +[TODO: I made a few more comments about kitchen knife deception (and let my friends talk me down from making more). I'm not worried about what he thinks about me anymore.] ------ diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md index 78623f2..ba4ba8a 100644 --- a/notes/memoir-sections.md +++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -marked TODO +unmarked TODO - Eliezerfic fight conclusion - December 2019 winter blogging vacation @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ _ "Lenore" psychiatric disaster ------ With internet available— -_ Eliezerfic fight: they're using their own definition (I don't recall what I meant by this) _ Eliezerfic fight: where did the super-AIDS example fit in cronologically? _ Keltham/Peranza exam answer should link specific tags _ Susan Fenimore Cooper @@ -75,9 +74,11 @@ _ Anna's claim that Scott was a target specifically because he was good, my coun _ Yudkowsky's LW moderation policy far editing tier— +_ dath ilan as a whining-based community _ footnote to explain that when I'm summarizing a long Discord conversation to taste, I might move things around into "logical" time rather than "real time"; e.g. Yudkowsky's "powerfully relevant" and "but Superman" comments were actually one right after the other; and, e.g., I'm filling in more details that didn't make it into the chat, like innate kung fu; and that the fact that I can "enhance" the summaries of my part, but the people I'm talking to don't have the same privilege, should be taken into account—actually, this covers a lot of the memoir; maybe I should mention this earlier (and again in a footnote??) _ 93's alternate theory of eliezera taste for deception _ Ruby fight: "forces of blandness want me gone ... stand my ground" remark +_ Ruby fight: asking Anna, what is CfAR for?? _ "Even our pollution is beneficial" [pt. 6] _ Scott Aaronson on the blockchain of science [pt. 6] _ Re: on legitimacy and the entrepreneur; or, continuing the attempt to spread my sociopathic awakening onto Scott [pt. 2 somewhere] @@ -241,7 +242,7 @@ people to consult before publishing, for feedback or right of objection— _ Tail (pt. 2 AGP discussion) _ Iceman _ Ben/Jessica (Michael) -_ "Wilhelm" +_ "Wilhelm" (not leaking info about his identity, and damage to him if info was leaked) _ Scott _ Anna _ "Noreen" @@ -2454,5 +2455,6 @@ Vanessa's comment about "I'm a woman in EA, and I don't get harrassed—maybe it https://medium.com/@sefashapiro/a-community-warning-about-ziz-76c100180509 -https://thingofthings.wordpress.com/2016/07/13/on-autogynephilia/ -https://thingofthings.substack.com/ \ No newline at end of file + + + diff --git a/notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv b/notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv index f02a60c..ff40dc8 100644 --- a/notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv +++ b/notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv @@ -360,4 +360,7 @@ 04/11/2023,118826,1036 04/12/2023,119842,1016 04/13/2023,119842,0 -04/14/2023,, \ No newline at end of file +04/14/2023,120189,347 +04/15/2023,120189,0 +04/16/2023,120470,281 +04/17/2023,, \ No newline at end of file -- 2.17.1