From 2d9d44a1d831f6c2ec3109e24e9f706969c6cc8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake" Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 13:24:29 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] dawdling check in ... Okay, even with the network cable out, it looks like it's easy to dawdle. (Either by just hanging out and thinking, or by looking at paper books: Hans Moravec and Bill Amend as a reminder that I Love the '90s.) To actually make this weekend retreat meaningful, I guess I'm going to have to resort to the crutch of a timer? --- ...-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md | 12 +++++++-- notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md | 25 +++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md index d44d876..13080cd 100644 --- a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md +++ b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md @@ -240,14 +240,22 @@ Until suddenly, in what was then the current year of 2016, it was now seeming th The claim that political privileges are inculcating "a culture of worthless, unredeemable scoundrels" in some _other_ group is easy to dimiss as bigotry, but it hits differently when you can _see it happening to people like you_. Notwithstanding whether the progressive story had been right about the trevails of blacks and women, I _know_ that straight boys who wish they were girls are not actually as fragile and helpless as we were being portrayed—that we _weren't_ that fragile, if anyone still remembers the world of 2006, when straight boys who wished they were girls knew that they were, in fact, straight boys, and didn't think the world owed them deference for their perversion. And this experience _did_ raise further questions about whether previous iterations of progressive ideology had been entirely honest with me. (If nothing else, I couldn't help but notice that my update from "Blanchard is probably wrong because trans women's self-reports say it's wrong" to "Self-reports are pretty crazy" probably had implications for "[Red Pill](https://heartiste.org/the-sixteen-commandments-of-poon/) is probably wrong because women's self-reports say it's wrong".) -While I was in this flurry of excitement about my recent updates and the insanity around me, I thought back to that "at least 20% of the ones with penises are actually women" Yudkowsky post from back in March that had been my wake-up call to all this. What _was_ going on there? +While I was in this flurry of excitement about my recent updates and the insanity around me, I thought back to that "at least 20% of the ones with penises are actually women" Yudkowsky post from back in March that had been my wake-up call to all this. What _was_ going with that? -Under ordinary circumstances, I wouldn't have dared bother Eliezer Yudkowsky (who I considered to be the most important person in the world) on _any_ topic, let alone this weird personal obsession of mine. But ... Yudkowsky _had_ posted about how he was willing to accept money to do things he otherwise wouldn't in exchange for enough money to feel happy about he trade—a Happy Price, or [Cheerful Price, as the custom was later termed](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/MzKKi7niyEqkBPnyu/your-cheerful-price)—and his [schedule of happy prices](https://www.facebook.com/yudkowsky/posts/10153956696609228) listed $1,000 as the price for a 2 hour conversation. Cheap, right?! +[ + +Under ordinary circumstances, I wouldn't have dared bother Eliezer Yudkowsky (who I considered to be the most important person in the world) on _any_ topic, let alone this weird personal obsession of mine. + +But ... Yudkowsky _had_ posted about how he was willing to accept money to do things he otherwise wouldn't in exchange for enough money to feel happy about he trade—a Happy Price, or [Cheerful Price, as the custom was later termed](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/MzKKi7niyEqkBPnyu/your-cheerful-price)—and his [schedule of happy prices](https://www.facebook.com/yudkowsky/posts/10153956696609228) listed $1,000 as the price for a 2 hour conversation. Cheap, right?! + +[TODO: does this seem cultish] I had his email address from previous contract work I had done for MIRI back in '12, so I wrote him offering $1,000 to talk about sometime between [January 2009](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/QZs4vkC7cbyjL9XA9/changing-emotions) and [March of the current year](https://www.facebook.com/yudkowsky/posts/10154078468809228) what kind of _massive_ update he made on the topics of human psychological sex differences and MtF transsexuality, mentioning that I had been "feeling baffled and disappointed (although I shouldn't be) that the rationality community is getting this _really easy_ scientific question wrong." [TODO: I can't actually confirm or deny whether he accepted the happy price offer because if we did talk, it would have been a private conversation] +] + (It was also around this time that I snuck a copy of _Men Trapped in Men's Bodies_ into the [MIRI](https://intelligence.org/) office library, which was sometimes possible for community members to visit. It seemed like something Harry Potter-Evans-Verres would do—and ominously, I noticed, not like something Hermione Granger would do.) Gatekeeping sessions finished, I finally started HRT at the end of December 2016. In an effort to not let my anti–autogynephilia-denialism crusade take over my life, earlier that month, I promised myself (and [published the SHA256 hash of the promise](https://www.facebook.com/zmdavis/posts/10154596054540199)) not to comment on gender issues under my real name through June 2017—_that_ was what my new pseudonymous blog was for. diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md index f882f75..fdfda64 100644 --- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md +++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md @@ -670,6 +670,8 @@ https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1501218503990431745 playing on a different chessboard—I would be fine with it if he didn't shit on my chessboard. But my shitting on his chessboard +I could forgive him for taking a shit on d4 of my chessboard ("at least 20% of the ones with penises are actually women"). I could even forgive him for subsequently taking a shit on e4 of my chessboard ("") as long as he wiped the shit off afterwards ([TODO linky-quotey clarification]), even though, really, I would have expected someone so smart to take a hint after the incident on d4. + Ben on Discursive Warfare and Faction Formation: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dou43_aX_h1lP7-wqU_5jJq62PuhotQaybe5H2HUmWc/edit > What's not wrong on purpose is persuasive but does not become a factional identity. What becomes a factional identity is wrong on purpose. @@ -750,9 +752,6 @@ https://www.glowfic.com/replies/1801374#reply-1801374 I joined the "Eliezerfic" server in spite of my enmity, and JoshTriplett is in there (contrary to my gut instinct that Rust peeps hate my rationalist peeps) -> "too many people think it's unvirtuous to shut up and listen to [him]" -https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1509944888376188929 - The cowardice is remarkable, coming from someone who otherwise jbeshir @@ -954,6 +953,9 @@ the Extropians post _explicitly_ says "may be a common sexual fantasy" ------ +Dath ilan has a concept of "the Light"—the vector in policyspace perpendicular outwards from the Pareto curve, in which everyone's interests coincide. + + In dath ilan they talk about the Light—the policy vector that everyone can agree on @@ -961,14 +963,23 @@ In dath ilan they talk about the Light—the policy vector that everyone can agr It's as if the guy has just completely given up on the idea that public speech is useful, or that anyone besides he and his flunkies are capable of thought. -> [TODO linky Tweet about "too many people think it's unvirtuous to shut up and listen to me"; I wish I had never written about LDT and just told people to vote] +> "too many people think it's unvirtuous to shut up and listen to me" I wish I had never written about LDT and just told people to vote for reasons they understand when they're older +https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1509944888376188929 + -What a _profoundly_ anti-intellectual statement! This is just not something you would say if you cared about having a rationality community that could process arguments and correct its own errors, rather than +What a _profoundly_ anti-intellectual statement! This is just not something you would say if you cared about having a rationality community that could process arguments and correct errors, -To be clear, there _is_ such a thing as legitimately trusting an authority who knows better than you. +rather than a robot cult +To be clear, there _is_ such a thing as legitimately trusting an authority who knows better than you. + That trust is a _finite resource_. ------- \ No newline at end of file +------ + + + + + -- 2.17.1