From 885612e72eac46be717d820d7942fadf3d1e2d39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake" Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 23:07:52 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fix busted italics --- content/2020/relative-gratitude-and-the-great-plague-of-2020.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/2020/relative-gratitude-and-the-great-plague-of-2020.md b/content/2020/relative-gratitude-and-the-great-plague-of-2020.md index edc565f..f203c59 100644 --- a/content/2020/relative-gratitude-and-the-great-plague-of-2020.md +++ b/content/2020/relative-gratitude-and-the-great-plague-of-2020.md @@ -11,6 +11,6 @@ So first the narrative was "flatten the curve": until a vaccine is developed, we The thing is, [the various "flatten the curve" propaganda charts](https://www.google.com/search?q=%22flatten+the+curve%22&tbm=isch) illustrating the idea didn't label their axes and depicted the "hospital system capacity" horizontal line above, or at most slightly below, the peak of the flattened curve, suggesting a scenario where mitigation efforts that merely slowed down the spread of the virus through the population would be enough to avoid disaster. Turns out, [when you run the numbers, that's too optimistic](https://medium.com/@joschabach/flattening-the-curve-is-a-deadly-delusion-eea324fe9727): at the peak of a merely mitigated epidemic, there will be many times over more people who need intensive care, than ICU beds for them to get it. These cold equations [suggest a more ambitious goal of "containment"](https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-the-hammer-and-the-dance-be9337092b56): _lock everything down_ as hard as we need to in order to get R0 below 1, and scurry to get enough testing, contract-tracing, and quarantining infrastructure in place to support gradually restarting the economy without restarting the outbreak. -The discussion goes on (is it feasible to callibrate the response that finely?—what of the economic cost? _&c._)—and that's what impresses me; that's what I'm grateful for. _The discussion goes on_. Sure, there's lots of the usual innumeracy, cognitive biases, and sheer wishful thinking, but when there's no strategic advantage to "playing dumb"—there's no pro-virus [coalition that might gain an advantage if we admit out loud that](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/DoPo4PDjgSySquHX8/heads-i-win-tails-never-heard-of-her-or-selective-reporting) they said something true—you can see people actually engage each other with [the full beauty of our weapons](https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/03/24/guided-by-the-beauty-of-our-weapons/), and, sometimes, _change their mind in response to new information_. The "flatten the curve" argument isn't "false" exactly (quantitatively slowing down the outbreak will, in fact, quantitatively make the overload on hospitals less bad), but the pretty charts portraying the flattened curve safely below the hospital capacity line were _substantively misleading_, and it was possible for someone to spend a _bounded and small) amount of effort to explain, "Hey, this is substantively misleading because ..." and _be heard_, to the extent that [the people who made one of the most popular "flatten the curve" charts published an updated version reflecting the new argument](https://thespinoff.co.nz/society/14-03-2020/after-flatten-the-curve-we-must-now-stop-the-spread-heres-what-that-means/). +The discussion goes on (is it feasible to callibrate the response that finely?—what of the economic cost? _&c._)—and that's what impresses me; that's what I'm grateful for. _The discussion goes on_. Sure, there's lots of the usual innumeracy, cognitive biases, and sheer wishful thinking, but when there's no strategic advantage to "playing dumb"—there's no pro-virus [coalition that might gain an advantage if we admit out loud that](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/DoPo4PDjgSySquHX8/heads-i-win-tails-never-heard-of-her-or-selective-reporting) they said something true—you can see people actually engage each other with [the full beauty of our weapons](https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/03/24/guided-by-the-beauty-of-our-weapons/), and, sometimes, _change their mind in response to new information_. The "flatten the curve" argument isn't "false" exactly (quantitatively slowing down the outbreak will, in fact, quantitatively make the overload on hospitals less bad), but the pretty charts portraying the flattened curve safely below the hospital capacity line were _substantively misleading_, and it was possible for someone to spend a bounded _and small_ amount of effort to explain, "Hey, this is substantively misleading because ..." and _be heard_, to the extent that [the people who made one of the most popular "flatten the curve" charts published an updated version reflecting the new argument](https://thespinoff.co.nz/society/14-03-2020/after-flatten-the-curve-we-must-now-stop-the-spread-heres-what-that-means/). This level of performance is ... not to be taken for granted. Take it from me. -- 2.17.1