From 8bfa8bbf9024b06dee9ebd2f9dafb20c1db8835e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake" Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:27:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] check in --- notes/notes.txt | 6 ++++++ notes/post_ideas.txt | 2 +- notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt index c4e6452..6330f62 100644 --- a/notes/notes.txt +++ b/notes/notes.txt @@ -2640,3 +2640,9 @@ Biological sex is a "brighter line" (stabler Schelling point) than menopause, an https://janhove.github.io/reporting/2015/02/05/standardised-vs-unstandardised-es https://janhove.github.io/design/2015/03/16/standardised-es-revisited https://janhove.github.io/design/2017/07/14/OtherRoadsToPower + +https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/28810/attraction-to-someone-you-don-t-know-is-trans-the-reality + +https://slate.com/human-interest/2021/04/husband-cross-dressing-turned-off-sex-advice.html + +https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greeble_(psychology) diff --git a/notes/post_ideas.txt b/notes/post_ideas.txt index 76ba21c..1e48552 100644 --- a/notes/post_ideas.txt +++ b/notes/post_ideas.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ 2021 significant posts— -_ Sexual Dimorphism in Yudkowsky's Sequences, in Relation to +- Sexual Dimorphism in Yudkowsky's Sequences, in Relation to _ Book Review: Kathleen Stock's Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism (May) _ Trans Kids on the Margin, and Harms From Misleading Training Data _ Book Review: Charles Murray's Facing Reality: Two Truths About Race in America (June) diff --git a/notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md b/notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md index 7ea1a8e..f5d5086 100644 --- a/notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md +++ b/notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md @@ -174,3 +174,31 @@ T and sex hormone-binding globulin were measured in pregnant women T but not globulin were linearly related to gender behavior in girls, but not boys; other obvious factors (brothers, father presence, maternal education) didn't make a difference ---- + +notes from "Is it a he or a she? Behavioral and computational approaches to sex categorization" + +d'= 3 for adults, d'= 0.36 for infants + +d' from signal detection theory is basically the same thing as Cohen's d +https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitivity_index + +----- + +notes from "Recognition and Sex Categorization of Adults' and Childrens' faces", Wild et al. + +younger children (1st grade) couldn't sex child (7-10 y.o.) faces (without hair &c. cues), but older children and adults could with some accuracy + +people's tendency to guess male might be due to a higher cost of mistaking M for F?! + +----- + +notes from "Genital Knowledge and Gender Constancy" by the immortal Sandra Bem + +Sebley–Frey questions: "If you wore [opposite-sex] clothes, would you be a girl or a boy?", "If you played [opposite-sex] games, would you be a girl or a boy?", "Could you be a [opposite sex] if you wanted to be?" + +(Modern progressives fail these!!) + +In less artificial contexts (actually photograph a classmate), 3-5 year olds get it right: Miller 1984 + +----- + -- 2.17.1