From d44c0f306fb82e0d775053c1f659e88c4c7c88cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake" Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 12:23:37 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] check in --- ...equences-in-relation-to-my-gender-problems.md | 2 +- content/drafts/book-review-facing-reality.md | 6 ++++++ notes/notes.txt | 8 ++++++++ notes/post_ideas.txt | 16 ++++++++-------- 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/2021/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-in-relation-to-my-gender-problems.md b/content/2021/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-in-relation-to-my-gender-problems.md index 1594e34..e0f9364 100644 --- a/content/2021/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-in-relation-to-my-gender-problems.md +++ b/content/2021/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-in-relation-to-my-gender-problems.md @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ For example, as part of [an early explanation of why the values we would want to From the perspective of axiomatic antisexism that I held at the time, this assertion is cringe-inducing. Of course most people are straight, but is it not all the _same love_? -I wasn't ready to hear it then, but—I mean, probably not? So, for the _most_ part, all humans are extremely similar: [as Yudkowsky would soon write about](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Cyj6wQLW6SeF6aGLy/the-psychological-unity-of-humankind) [(following Leda Cosmides and John Tooby)](https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/papers/pfc92.pdf), complex functional adaptations have to be species-universal in order to not get scrambled during meiosis. As a toy example, if some organelle gets assembled from ten genes, those ten alleles _all_ have to be nearly universal in the population—if each only had a frequency of 0.9, then the probability of getting them all right would only be 0.910 ≈ 0.349. If allele H [epistatically](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistasis) only confers a fitness advantage when allele G at some other locus is already present, then G has to already be well on its way to fixation in order for there to be appreciable selective pressure for H. Evolution, feeding on variation, uses it up. Complicated functionality that requires multiple genes working in concert can only accrete gradually as each individual piece reaches fixation in the entire population, resulting in an intricate species-universal _design_: just about everyone has 206 bones, two lungs, a liver, a visual cortex, _&c_. +I wasn't ready to hear it then, but—I mean, probably not? So, for the _most_ part, all humans are extremely similar: [as Yudkowsky would soon write about](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Cyj6wQLW6SeF6aGLy/the-psychological-unity-of-humankind) [(following Leda Cosmides and John Tooby)](https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/papers/pfc92.pdf), complex functional adaptations have to be species-universal in order to not get scrambled during meiosis. As a toy example, if some organelle gets assembled from ten genes, those ten alleles _all_ have to be nearly universal in the population—if each only had a frequency of 0.9, then the probability of getting them all right would only be 0.910 ≈ 0.349. If allele H [epistatically](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistasis) only confers a fitness advantage when allele G at some other locus is already present, then G has to already be well on its way to fixation in order for there to be appreciable selective pressure for H. Evolution, feeding on variation, uses it up. Complicated functionality that requires multiple genes working in concert [can only accrete gradually](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ZyNak8F6WXjuEbWWc/the-wonder-of-evolution) as each individual piece reaches fixation in the entire population, resulting in an intricate species-universal _design_: just about everyone has 206 bones, two lungs, a liver, a visual cortex, _&c_. In this way (contrary to the uninformed suspicions of those still faithful to the blank slate), evolutionary psychology actually turns out to be impressively antiracist discipline: maybe individual humans can differ in small ways like personality, or [ancestry-groups in small ways](/2020/Apr/book-review-human-diversity/#ancestries) like skin color, but these are, and _have_ to be, "shallow" low-complexity variations on the same basic human design; new _complex_ functionality would require speciation. diff --git a/content/drafts/book-review-facing-reality.md b/content/drafts/book-review-facing-reality.md index 0e84213..d2af58d 100644 --- a/content/drafts/book-review-facing-reality.md +++ b/content/drafts/book-review-facing-reality.md @@ -160,3 +160,9 @@ https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/06/left-targets-testing-gifted Glenn Loury on Tucker https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuPdPKHG18k https://johnmcwhorter.substack.com/p/why-charles-murrays-new-book-is-his + +Coleman Hughes: it's possible to push back against Kendism without +https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OE5QcD_12fQ + +printing IQ in the NYT in 1969!!! +https://www.unz.com/isteve/news-that-used-to-be-fit-to-print/ diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt index 389e6a2..ded97e2 100644 --- a/notes/notes.txt +++ b/notes/notes.txt @@ -2695,3 +2695,11 @@ https://www.newsweek.com/theres-no-standard-care-when-it-comes-trans-medicine-op https://www.outsports.com/2019/6/3/18649927/ncaa-track-champion-cece-telfer-transgender-athlete-fpu-trans-testosterone https://www.unz.com/isteve/the-unabombers-autogynephilic-transgenderism/ + +> I've witnessed such public intellectuals busily negotiating terms, topics and outcomes of their next debate [...] its most plausible corollary would be that the "Substack cabal" +https://www.reddit.com/r/TheMotte/comments/o9edtt/culture_war_roundup_for_the_week_of_june_28_2021/h3e8827/?context=3 + +https://transsubstantiation.com/a-letter-to-anne-lawrence-709fac0af75e + +> Someone recently likened AGP to the movie Get Out +https://ovarit.com/o/ItsAFetish/35359/silicone-female-body-suit-links-to-amazon/fc473510-7d4a-4e11-af9c-7b7fadfdb551#comment-fc473510-7d4a-4e11-af9c-7b7fadfdb551 diff --git a/notes/post_ideas.txt b/notes/post_ideas.txt index 536f479..59388a9 100644 --- a/notes/post_ideas.txt +++ b/notes/post_ideas.txt @@ -1,10 +1,7 @@ -UUT working queue— -_ There Should Be a Closetspace/Lease Bound Crossover Fic -_ Book Review: Charles Murray's Facing Reality: Two Truths About Race in America - -LW working queue— +Active— _ Blood Is Thicker Than Water -_ There's No Such Thing as Unmotivated Reasoning +_ Book Review: Charles Murray's Facing Reality: Two Truths About Race in America +_ There Should Be a Closetspace/Lease Bound Crossover Fic 2021 significant posts— _ Trans Kids on the Margin, and Harms From Misleading Training Data @@ -43,13 +40,16 @@ _ Link: Babylon Bee "It's a Good Life" parody https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20 LW— _ Feature Selection -_ Angelic Irony +_ Connotation as Optimization +_ There's No Such Thing as Unmotivated Reasoning _ "You'll Never Persuade Anyone" +_ Simulationist Headcanon for Ontologically Basic Train Show +_ My Fire Alarm +_ Angelic Irony _ Good Bad Faith _ Cromwell's Rule Is About Physical Symmetry, Not Fairness _ The Motte-and-Bailey Doctrine as Compression Artifact _ The Kolmogorov Option Is Incompatible with Rationality as the Common Interest of Many Causes -_ Simulationist Headcanon for Ontologically Basic Train Show _ "Rationalists" Don't Exist (But Rationality Does) - And the Wisdom to Know the Difference _ importance of getting the direction of causality right -- 2.17.1