From d9dc97d28aa8ae44e445ba537a7d3ec5783288de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake" Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 22:32:42 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] check in notes/clippings --- notes/notes.txt | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt index 1bef613..40802bd 100644 --- a/notes/notes.txt +++ b/notes/notes.txt @@ -691,3 +691,11 @@ https://twitter.com/compiledwrong/status/994263573512601600 "How long does it ta https://twitter.com/turnthetide2018/status/1023959468764213248 http://andrewgelman.com/2007/08/14/more_taboo_rese/ + +http://www.bostonherald.com/news/columnists/howie_carr/2018/08/howie_carr_jim_lyons_out_pcs_the_democrats The only thing that would make this story more entertaining is if the Democrats bit the bullet and approved every amendment. (Or earnestly debated that e.g. there should be exactly one of "cis female" and "cis woman" &c.) + +I should read Li Kung and Hines 2017 https://twitter.com/rftbk/status/1027314120381620230 + +The Rust survey asks: "If you find it difficult to participate in the Rust community, and feel comfortable giving more details, please tell us what makes it difficult" with the subhead "Optional. Please share only what you are comfortable sharing". I write: "I have some nuanced and detailed views on transgender issues that I suspect might make me a target for exclusion if people knew about them? Mostly this doesn't matter (the community is focused on technology, as it should be), but it does feel slightly sad to be socially incentivized to separate the technology-focused and sociopolitically-focused aspects of one's public intellectual persona (by having a second blog under a pseudonym, &c.) in a way that people with other views probably aren't." + +what can go wrong: https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/95z2zj/i_dont_think_im_going_to_my_girls_hobby_club/ -- 2.17.1