From ea34c40dd037e92f5603f1ef7233db6e97b49427 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Zack M. Davis" Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:21:22 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] =?utf8?q?add=20free=20speech=20=F0=9F=96=A4=20stickers=20?= =?utf8?q?to=20stricker=20graffiti=20post?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- content/2023/proceduralist-sticker-graffiti.md | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/content/2023/proceduralist-sticker-graffiti.md b/content/2023/proceduralist-sticker-graffiti.md index 5035120..9cc5eaa 100644 --- a/content/2023/proceduralist-sticker-graffiti.md +++ b/content/2023/proceduralist-sticker-graffiti.md @@ -19,3 +19,7 @@ What's extraordinary about these slogans is how meta they are: advocating for pr I should wish to live in a Society where such thoughts are too commonplace to be worth a sticker, rather than so rare that seeing them expressed in stickers should provoke an entire blog post. As things are, I was happy to see the stickers and felt that they were somehow less out-of-place here than they would have been in Berkeley, fifteen miles west in geographical space and a couple years further in political time. Who put these stickers here? I wish I could meet them, and find out if I'm projecting too much of my own philosophy onto these simple slogans. What would they say, if prompted to describe their politics and given more than six words of bandwidth to reply? Would their bravery have been deterred (as mine probably would) had their target already been defaced by a decal bearing a different tagline, "STICKER GRAFFITI VIOLATES PROPERTY RIGHTS"? + +**Addendum, 15 December 2023**: I missed these ("FREE SPEECH" inside of a heart), at the foot of the lamp post— + + -- 2.17.1