From f0a03ee4371dcf595eb771448958fd975ac2e583 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake" Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 20:53:45 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] remove a tag, correct a link --- content/2016/new-clothes.md | 1 - content/2016/reply-to-ozy-on-agp.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/2016/new-clothes.md b/content/2016/new-clothes.md index 8c43417..53daa86 100644 --- a/content/2016/new-clothes.md +++ b/content/2016/new-clothes.md @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ Title: New Clothes Date: 2016-11-21 Category: other -Tags: two-type taxonomy If we can't have a more truthful world, I think I would prefer more lies and fewer delusions on the margin. diff --git a/content/2016/reply-to-ozy-on-agp.md b/content/2016/reply-to-ozy-on-agp.md index 22ec49e..1ea7240 100644 --- a/content/2016/reply-to-ozy-on-agp.md +++ b/content/2016/reply-to-ozy-on-agp.md @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Date: 2016-10-01 18:00 Category: commentary Tags: autogynephilia -This post is a response to Ozymandias's ["On Autogynephilia"](https://thingofthings.wordpress.com/2016/07/13/on-autogynephilia/), published on their (highly recommended!) blog, [_Thing of Things_](https://thingofthings.wordpress.com/2016/07/13/on-autogynephilia/). +This post is a response to Ozymandias's ["On Autogynephilia"](https://thingofthings.wordpress.com/2016/07/13/on-autogynephilia/), published on their (highly recommended!) blog, [_Thing of Things_](https://thingofthings.wordpress.com/). > nothing in this post should be taken as an endorsement of the Blanchard-Bailey theory of autogynephilia, which is clearly untrue. -- 2.17.1