-first edit pass bookmark: "I got a chance to talk to"
-
-time-sensitive globals TODOs—
-✓ address red team objections to pt. 3
-- apply pro edits to pt. 3
-- address auto edit tier to pt. 3
-_ schedule Friendship Day at Valinor
-_ consult Anna
-_ clear with Steven
-_ Jessica's dramapost § in pt. 5
-_ consult 93 about Jessica's dramapost §
-_ finish and ship "Reply to Scott on Autogenderphilia"
-_ finish and ship "Hrunkner Unnerby"
-_ psychiatric disaster private doc
-_ clear with Michael/Ben/Jessica
-_ clear with Alicorn
-_ clear with Kelsey
-_ clear with Ray
-_ clear with Ruby
-_ SHIP PT. 3!!
-------------
-_ address auto edit tier to pt. 4–5
-_ red team pt. 4–5
-_ pro edit pt. 4–5
-_ consult lc
-
-
-pt. 3 edit tier (auto edition)—
-✓ FTX aside footnote version
-✓ revert alphabet names (from 17638259f20)
-✓ narcissistic delusions
-✓ clarify that cheerful price history is with Anna specifically
-_ screenshot "pleading, snarky reply"
-_ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links
-----
-_ breakup song
-_ briefly speculate on causes of brain damage (tie in to moderation policy?)
-_ being friends with dogs (it's good, but do I have the wordcount budget?)
-_ Ruby fight: "forces of blandness want me gone ... stand my ground" remark
-_ mention that I was miffed about "Boundaries?" not getting Curated, while one of Euk's animal posts did
-_ explicitly mention http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/bad-faith-behavior-not-feeling/
-_ meeting with Ray (maybe?)
-_ mention Said rigor check somewhere, nervousness about Michael's gang being a mini-egregore
-_ I should respond to Ziz's charges that my criticism of concept-policing was a form of concept-policing
-_ Anna's claim that Scott was a target specifically because he was good, my counterclaim that payment can't be impunity
-_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"?
-_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing
-_ the "reducing negativity" post does obliquely hint at the regression point being general
-_ link to protest flyer
-_ establish usage of "coordination group" vs. "posse"? (editor might catch?)
-_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to see an obvious analogy (editor might catch?)
-_ better explanation of MOPs in "Social Reality" scuffle (editor might catch?)
-_ better context on "scam" &c. earlier (editor might catch?)
-_ cut words from descriptions of other posts! (editor might catch?)
-_ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) (but it still seems clear to me on re-read?)
-