-_ fullname Taylor and Hoffman at start of pt. 3
-_ footnote clarifying that "Riley" and Sarah weren't core members of the group, despite being included on some emails?
-_ be more specific about Ben's anti-EA and Jessica's anti-MIRI things, perhaps in footnotes
-_ Ben on "locally coherent coordination": use direct quotes for Ben's language—maybe rewrite in my own language (footnote?) as an understanding test
-_ set context for "EA Has a Lying Problem" (written by Sarah, likely with Michael's influence—maybe ask Sarah)
-_ clarify schism (me and Vassar bros leaving the EA/rat borg?)
-_ set context for Anna on first mention in the postq
-_ more specific on "mostly pretty horrifying" and group conversation with the whole house
-_ paragraph to explain the cheerful price bit
-_ cut words from the "Yes Requires" slapfight?
-_ better introduction of Steven Kaas
-_ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray
-_ cut many words from "Social Reality" scuffle
-_ is "long May 2020" link still good?
+✓ fullname Taylor and Hoffman at start of pt. 3
+✓ footnote clarifying that "Riley" and Sarah weren't core members of the group, despite being included on some emails?
+✓ be more specific about Ben's anti-EA and Jessica's anti-MIRI things
+✓ weird that Kelsey thought the issue was that we were trying to get Yudkowsky to make a statement
+✓ set context for Anna on first mention in the post
+✓ more specific on "mostly pretty horrifying" and group conversation with the whole house
+✓ cut words from the "Yes Requires" slapfight?
+✓ cut words from "Social Reality" scuffle
+✓ examples of "bitter and insulting" comments about rationalists
+✓ Scott got comas right in the same year as "Categories"
+✓ "I" statements
+✓ we can go stronger than "I definitely don't think Yudkowsky thinks of himself
+✓ cut words from December 2019 blogging spree
+✓ mention "Darkest Timeline" and Skyrms somewhere
+✓ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray
+✓ the skeptical family friend's view
+✓ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish
+✓ "admit that you are in fact adding a bit of autobiography to the memoir."
+✓ anyone who drives at all
+✓ clarify that can't remember details: "everyone else seemed to agree on things"
+✓ "It's not just talking hypothetically, it is specifically calling a bluff, the point of the hypothetical"
+✓ the history of civil rights
+✓ it's not obvious why you can't recommend "What You Can't Say"
+✓ Ben on "locally coherent coordination" don't unattributedly quote
+
+_ "it might matter timelessly" → there are people with AI chops who are PC (/2017/Jan/from-what-ive-tasted-of-desire/)
+_ confusing people and ourselves about what the exact crime is
+_ footnote explaining quibbles on clarification
+_ FTX validated Ben's view of EA!! ("systematically conflating corruption, accumulation of dominance, and theft, with getting things done")
+_ "your failure to model social reality is believing people when they claim noble motives"
+_ hint at Vanessa being trans
+
+_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"?
+_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing
+_ link to protest flyer
+_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to understand what I see as the obvious analogy
+_ better explanation of MOPs in "Social Reality" scuffle