-_ paragraph to explain the cheerful price bit
-_ cut words from the "Yes Requires" slapfight?
-_ better introduction of Steven Kaas
-_ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray
-_ cut many words from "Social Reality" scuffle
-_ is "long May 2020" link still good?
-_ better context on "scam" &c. earlier
-_ meeting with Ray
-_ Ben's "financial fraud don't inquire as to the conscious motives of the perp" claim may be false
-_ later thoughts on jump to evaluation, translating between different groups' language
-_ mention that I was miffed about "Boundaries?" not getting Curated, while one of Euk's animal posts did
-_ examples of "bitter and insulting" comments about rationalists
-_ cut words from descriptions of other posts! (if people want to read them, they can click through)
-_ explicitly mention http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/bad-faith-behavior-not-feeling/
-_ cut words from NRx denouncement Jessica discussion
-_ "I" statements
-_ we can go stronger than "I definitely don't think Yudkowsky _thinks of himself_ as having given up on Speech _in those words_"
-_ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it)
-_ cut lots of words from December 2019 blogging spree
-_ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish
-_ choice quotes in "end of the Category War" thank you note
+✓ cut words from the "Yes Requires" slapfight?
+✓ cut words from "Social Reality" scuffle
+✓ examples of "bitter and insulting" comments about rationalists
+✓ Scott got comas right in the same year as "Categories"
+✓ "I" statements
+✓ we can go stronger than "I definitely don't think Yudkowsky thinks of himself
+✓ cut words from December 2019 blogging spree
+✓ mention "Darkest Timeline" and Skyrms somewhere
+✓ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray
+✓ the skeptical family friend's view
+✓ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish
+✓ "admit that you are in fact adding a bit of autobiography to the memoir."
+✓ anyone who drives at all
+✓ clarify that can't remember details: "everyone else seemed to agree on things"
+✓ "It's not just talking hypothetically, it is specifically calling a bluff, the point of the hypothetical"
+✓ the history of civil rights
+✓ it's not obvious why you can't recommend "What You Can't Say"
+✓ Ben on "locally coherent coordination" don't unattributedly quote
+
+_ "it might matter timelessly" → there are people with AI chops who are PC (/2017/Jan/from-what-ive-tasted-of-desire/)
+_ confusing people and ourselves about what the exact crime is
+_ footnote explaining quibbles on clarification
+_ FTX validated Ben's view of EA!! ("systematically conflating corruption, accumulation of dominance, and theft, with getting things done")
+_ "your failure to model social reality is believing people when they claim noble motives"
+_ hint at Vanessa being trans
+