+✓ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray
+✓ the skeptical family friend's view
+✓ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish
+✓ "admit that you are in fact adding a bit of autobiography to the memoir."
+✓ anyone who drives at all
+✓ clarify that can't remember details: "everyone else seemed to agree on things"
+✓ "It's not just talking hypothetically, it is specifically calling a bluff, the point of the hypothetical"
+✓ the history of civil rights
+✓ it's not obvious why you can't recommend "What You Can't Say"
+✓ Ben on "locally coherent coordination" don't unattributedly quote
+
+_ "it might matter timelessly" → there are people with AI chops who are PC (/2017/Jan/from-what-ive-tasted-of-desire/)
+_ confusing people and ourselves about what the exact crime is
+_ footnote explaining quibbles on clarification
+_ FTX validated Ben's view of EA!! ("systematically conflating corruption, accumulation of dominance, and theft, with getting things done")
+_ "your failure to model social reality is believing people when they claim noble motives"
+_ hint at Vanessa being trans
+_ quote Jack on timelines anxiety
+
+_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"?
+_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing
+_ link to protest flyer
+_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to understand what I see as the obvious analogy