> He says he likes "monastic rationalism vs. lay rationalism" as a frame for the schism Ben is proposing.
> I suspect Scott is calling the wrong side monastic, though - we basically believe it can be done by lay people, he doesn't. I'll be pleasantly surprised if he gets the sides right, though.
+
+Dawkins and Dennett have joined the intellectual gender-ID skeptics; shame that Yudkowsky can't reach that level