-first edit pass bookmark: "seemed to accept this as an inevitable background"
+first edit pass bookmark: "I received a Twitter DM from"
blocks to fit somewhere—
_ the hill he wants to die on (conclusion for "Zevi's Choice"??)
✓ cut words from the "Yes Requires" slapfight?
✓ cut words from "Social Reality" scuffle
✓ examples of "bitter and insulting" comments about rationalists
-- Scott got comas right in the same year as "Categories"
------
+✓ Scott got comas right in the same year as "Categories"
+✓ "I" statements
+✓ we can go stronger than "I definitely don't think Yudkowsky thinks of himself
+✓ cut words from December 2019 blogging spree
+✓ mention "Darkest Timeline" and Skyrms somewhere
+
+pt. 3 content fills—
+✓ the skeptical family friend's view
+✓ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish
+_ confusing people and ourselves about what the exact crime is
+_ footnote explaining quibbles on clarification
+_ FTX validated Ben's view of EA!!
+
+pt. 3 minor—
+✓ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray
_ Ben on "locally coherent coordination": use direct quotes for Ben's language—maybe rewrite in my own language (footnote?) as an understanding test
-_ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray
+_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"?
+_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing
+_ link to protest flyer
+_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to understand what I see as the obvious analogy
_ better explanation of MOPs in "Social Reality" scuffle
_ better context on "scam" &c. earlier
-_ meeting with Ray?
_ mention that I was miffed about "Boundaries?" not getting Curated, while one of Euk's animal posts did
_ establish usage of "coordination group" vs. "posse"?
_ LessWrong vs. GreaterWrong for comment links?
_ cut words from descriptions of other posts! (if people want to read them, they can click through ... but on review, these descriptions seem pretty reasonable?)
--------
-_ cut words from NRx denouncement Jessica discussion
-_ later thoughts on jump to evaluation, translating between different groups' language
+_ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) (but it still seems clear to me on re-read?)
_ explicitly mention http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/bad-faith-behavior-not-feeling/
-_ "I" statements
-_ we can go stronger than "I definitely don't think Yudkowsky _thinks of himself_ as having given up on Speech _in those words_"
-_ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it)
-_ cut lots of words from December 2019 blogging spree
-_ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish
-_ choice quotes in "end of the Category War" thank you note
-_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"?
-_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing
-_ mention "Darkest Timeline" and Skyrms somewhere
-_ footnote explaining quibbles? (the first time I tried to write this, I hesitated, not sure if necessary)
-_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to understand what I see as the obvious analogy
-_ first mention of Jack G. should introduce him properly
-_ link to protest flyer
-
+_ meeting with Ray (maybe?)
pt. 4 edit tier—
_ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement)
_ "Doublethink" ref in Xu discussion should mention that Word of God Eliezerfic clarification that it's not about telling others
_ https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/vvc2MiZvWgMFaSbhx/book-review-the-bell-curve-by-charles-murray/comment/git7xaE2aHfSZyLzL
+
things to discuss with Michael/Ben/Jessica—
_ Anna on Paul Graham
-_ compression of Yudkowsky thinking reasoning wasn't useful
-_ Michael's SLAPP against REACH
-_ Michael on creepy and crazy men
-_ elided Sasha disaster
+_ Yudkowsky thinking reasoning wasn't useful
+_ Michael's SLAPP against REACH (new)
+_ Michael on creepy and crazy men (new)
+_ elided Sasha disaster (new)
pt. 3–5 prereaders—
_ David Xu
_ Ray
_ Ruby
-_ Teortaxes? (he might be interested)
+_ Alicorner #drama ("Is anyone interested in offering political advice or 'hostile advice'")
-------
projects / Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git / blobdiff