first edit pass bookmark: "I got a chance to talk to"
-pt. 3 edit tier (red team edition)—
-—
+time-sensitive globals TODOs—
+✓ address red team objections to pt. 3
+✓ schedule Friendship Day at Valinor
+✓ apply pro edits to pt. 3
+✓ address auto edit tier to pt. 3
+- rephrase "everyone-yelling operation" in pt. 5
+_ consult Anna
+_ clear with Steven
+_ finish and ship "Reply to Scott on Autogenderphilia"
+_ finish and ship "Hrunkner Unnerby"
+_ psychiatric disaster private doc
+_ clear with Michael/Ben/Jessica
+_ clear with Alicorn
+_ clear with Kelsey
+_ clear with Ray
+_ clear with Ruby
+_ SHIP PT. 3!!
+------------
+_ address auto edit tier to pt. 4–5
+_ red team pt. 4–5
+_ pro edit pt. 4–5
+_ consult lc
+
pt. 3 edit tier (auto edition)—
-✓ footnote on the bad-faith condition on "My Price for Joining"
-✓ footnote explaining quibbles on clarification
-✓ quote Yudkowsky's LW moderation policy
-✓ hint at "Yes Requires" objector being trans
-✓ quote Jack on timelines anxiety
-✓ clarify "A Lesson is Learned"
-- nuance and FTX epilogue
-_ clarify that cheerful price history is with Anna specifically
-_ briefly speculate on causes of brain damage (tie in to moderation policy?)
+✓ FTX aside footnote version
+✓ revert alphabet names (from 17638259f20)
+✓ narcissistic delusions
+✓ clarify that cheerful price history is with Anna specifically
+✓ screenshot "pleading, snarky reply"
+✓ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links
+✓ return on cognitive investment
+✓ establish usage of "coordination group" vs. "posse" (posse)
+✓ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"
----
+_ Ruby fight included ban threat, "forces of blandness want me gone ... stand my ground" remark
+_ breakup song
+_ briefly speculate on causes of brain damage (tie in to moderation policy?)
_ being friends with dogs (it's good, but do I have the wordcount budget?)
-_ Ruby fight: "forces of blandness want me gone ... stand my ground" remark
_ mention that I was miffed about "Boundaries?" not getting Curated, while one of Euk's animal posts did
_ explicitly mention http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/bad-faith-behavior-not-feeling/
_ meeting with Ray (maybe?)
_ mention Said rigor check somewhere, nervousness about Michael's gang being a mini-egregore
_ I should respond to Ziz's charges that my criticism of concept-policing was a form of concept-policing
_ Anna's claim that Scott was a target specifically because he was good, my counterclaim that payment can't be impunity
-_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"?
_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing
_ the "reducing negativity" post does obliquely hint at the regression point being general
_ link to protest flyer
-_ establish usage of "coordination group" vs. "posse"? (editor might catch?)
_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to see an obvious analogy (editor might catch?)
_ better explanation of MOPs in "Social Reality" scuffle (editor might catch?)
_ better context on "scam" &c. earlier (editor might catch?)
_ cut words from descriptions of other posts! (editor might catch?)
_ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) (but it still seems clear to me on re-read?)
-_ screenshot "pleading, snarky reply"
-_ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links
pt. 4 edit tier—
✓ "Ideology Is Not the Movement" mentions not misgendering
_ the hill he wants to die on
_ humans have honor instead of TDT. "That's right! I'm appealing to your honor!"
_ Leeroy Jenkins Option
+_ consult 93 about Jessica's dramapost §
_ historical non-robot-cult rationality wisdom
_ work in the "some clever gambit to play trans activists and gender-critical feminists against each other"
_ finale: mention that I'm not doing the dumb reversed-stupidity thing
things to discuss with Michael/Ben/Jessica—
_ Anna on Paul Graham
_ Yudkowsky thinking reasoning wasn't useful
-_ Jessica brought up race & IQ (she skimmed the previous draft, so I should highlight this)
-_ FTX and nuance epilogue (new)
+_ Jessica brought up race & IQ (she skimmed the previous draft, so I should highlight), or calling Ruby a MOP
+_ Ben publish "Discursive Warfare and Faction Formation" doc?
+_ footnote about FTX
+_ revision of "yelling" description
_ Michael's SLAPP against REACH (new)
_ Michael on creepy and crazy men (new)
_ elided Sasha disaster (new)
+_ what should I say to Iceman?
+_ "yelling"
pt. 3–5 prereaders—
-----
-
Michael said that we didn't want to police Eliezer's behavior, but just note that something had seemingly changed and move on. "There are a lot of people who can be usefully informed about the change," Michael said. "Not him though."
That was the part I couldn't understand, the part I couldn't accept.
projects / Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git / blobdiff