-first edit pass bookmark: "I also wrote a little post on"
+first edit pass bookmark: "I received a Twitter DM from"
blocks to fit somewhere—
_ the hill he wants to die on (conclusion for "Zevi's Choice"??)
✓ "I" statements
✓ we can go stronger than "I definitely don't think Yudkowsky thinks of himself
✓ cut words from December 2019 blogging spree
------
-_ Ben on "locally coherent coordination": use direct quotes for Ben's language—maybe rewrite in my own language (footnote?) as an understanding test
-_ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray
+✓ mention "Darkest Timeline" and Skyrms somewhere
+✓ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray
+✓ the skeptical family friend's view
+✓ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish
+✓ "admit that you are in fact adding a bit of autobiography to the memoir."
+✓ anyone who drives at all
+✓ clarify that can't remember details: "everyone else seemed to agree on things"
+✓ "It's not just talking hypothetically, it is specifically calling a bluff, the point of the hypothetical"
+✓ the history of civil rights
+✓ it's not obvious why you can't recommend "What You Can't Say"
+✓ Ben on "locally coherent coordination" don't unattributedly quote
+
+_ "it might matter timelessly" → there are people with AI chops who are PC (/2017/Jan/from-what-ive-tasted-of-desire/)
+_ confusing people and ourselves about what the exact crime is
+_ footnote explaining quibbles on clarification
+_ FTX validated Ben's view of EA!! ("systematically conflating corruption, accumulation of dominance, and theft, with getting things done")
+_ "your failure to model social reality is believing people when they claim noble motives"
+_ hint at Vanessa being trans
+
+_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"?
+_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing
+_ link to protest flyer
+_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to understand what I see as the obvious analogy
_ better explanation of MOPs in "Social Reality" scuffle
_ better context on "scam" &c. earlier
-_ meeting with Ray?
_ mention that I was miffed about "Boundaries?" not getting Curated, while one of Euk's animal posts did
_ establish usage of "coordination group" vs. "posse"?
_ LessWrong vs. GreaterWrong for comment links?
_ cut words from descriptions of other posts! (if people want to read them, they can click through ... but on review, these descriptions seem pretty reasonable?)
_ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) (but it still seems clear to me on re-read?)
-_ I still mostly feel like being more detailed than "fraud"; later thoughts on jump to evaluation, translating between different groups' language
-_ FTX validated Ben's view of EA!!
_ explicitly mention http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/bad-faith-behavior-not-feeling/
--------
-_ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish
-_ choice quotes in "end of the Category War" thank you note
-_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"?
-_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing
-_ mention "Darkest Timeline" and Skyrms somewhere
-_ footnote explaining quibbles? (the first time I tried to write this, I hesitated, not sure if necessary)
-_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to understand what I see as the obvious analogy
-_ first mention of Jack G. should introduce him properly
-_ link to protest flyer
-
+_ meeting with Ray (maybe?)
pt. 4 edit tier—
_ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement)
_ revise and cut words from "bad faith" section since can link to "Assume Bad Faith"
_ cut words from January 2020 Twitter exchange (after war criminal defenses)
_ everyone *who matters* prefers to stay on the good side
+_ if you only say good things about Republican candidates
pt. 5 edit tier—
_ quote specific exchange where I mentioned 10,000 words of philosophy that Scott was wrong—obviously the wrong play
_ "Doublethink" ref in Xu discussion should mention that Word of God Eliezerfic clarification that it's not about telling others
_ https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/vvc2MiZvWgMFaSbhx/book-review-the-bell-curve-by-charles-murray/comment/git7xaE2aHfSZyLzL
+
things to discuss with Michael/Ben/Jessica—
_ Anna on Paul Graham
_ Yudkowsky thinking reasoning wasn't useful
-_ Michael's SLAPP against REACH
-_ Michael on creepy and crazy men
-_ elided Sasha disaster
+_ Michael's SLAPP against REACH (new)
+_ Michael on creepy and crazy men (new)
+_ elided Sasha disaster (new)
pt. 3–5 prereaders—
_ David Xu
_ Ray
_ Ruby
-_ Teortaxes? (he might be interested)
_ Alicorner #drama ("Is anyone interested in offering political advice or 'hostile advice'")
_ objections and replies in dath ilan ancillary
_ kitchen knife section in dath ilan ancillary
+pt. 6 edit tier—
+_ coach suggests, "Arguably this doesn't count as punishment for the same reason we don't say we're "punishing" a rabid animal by euthanizing it: it's not about disincentivizing the behaviour."
+
dath ilan ancillary tier—
_ Who are the 9 most important legislators called?
_ collect Earth people sneers
projects / Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git / blobdiff