✓ scuffle on "Yes Requires the Possibility" [pt. 4]
✓ "Unnatural Categories Are Optimized for Deception" [pt. 4]
✓ Eliezerfic fight: will-to-Truth vs. will-to-happiness [pt. 6]
+✓ Eliezerfic fight: Ayn Rand and children's morals [pt. 6]
+✓ AI timelines scam [pt. 4]
+
- regrets, wasted time, conclusion [pt. 6]
+
- "Lesswrong.com is dead to me" [pt. 4]
-_ Eliezerfic fight: Ayn Rand and children's morals [pt. 6]
-_ AI timelines scam [pt. 4]
_ secret thread with Ruby [pt. 4]
_ progress towards discussing the real thing [pt. 4]
_ epistemic defense meeting [pt. 4]
+
+_ December 2019 winter blogging vacation [pt. 4]
+_ plan to reach out to Rick [pt. 4]
+
_ Eliezerfic fight: Big Yud tests me [pt. 6]
_ Eliezerfic fight: derail with lintamande [pt. 6]
_ Eliezerfic fight: knives, and showing myself out [pt. 6]
+
_ reaction to Ziz [pt. 4]
_ confronting Olivia [pt. 2]
_ State of Steven [pt. 4]
_ Somni [pt. 4]
_ culture off the rails; my warning points to Vaniver [pt. 4]
-_ December 2019 winter blogging vacation [pt. 4]
-_ plan to reach out to Rick [pt. 4]
_ complicity and friendship [pt. 4]
_ out of patience email [pt. 4]
_ the hill he wants to die on [pt. 6?]
it was actually "wander onto the AGI mailing list wanting to build a really big semantic net" (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9HGR5qatMGoz4GhKj/above-average-ai-scientists)
With internet available—
-_ space opera TVTrope?
-_ Word of God TVTropes page
-_ March 2017 Blanchard Tweeting my blog?
-_ bug emoji
+_ comment on "Timelines Scam" re "The Two-Party Swindle"
+_ "they had to know at some level": link to "why we can't take expected values literally"
+_ publication date of "The AI Timelines Scam"
+_ "around plot relevant sentences" ... only revealing, which, specifically?
_ what was I replying to, re: "why you actually don't want to be a happier but less accurate predictor"?
-_ Meta-Honesty critique well-received: cite 2019 review guide
-_ https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/2Ses9aB8jSDZtyRnW/duncan-sabien-on-moderating-lesswrong#comment-aoqWNe6aHcDiDh8dr
-_ https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/trvFowBfiKiYi7spb/open-thread-july-2019#comment-RYhKrKAxiQxY3FcHa
_ relevant screenshots for Eliezerfic play-by-play
-_ correct italics in quoted Eliezerfic back-and-forth
_ lc on elves and Sparashki
_ Nate would later admit that this was a mistake (or ask Jessica where)
_ Michael Bailey's new AGP in women study
-_ "gene drive" terminology
-_ double-check "All rates" language
_ footnote "said that he wishes he'd never published"
-_ hate-warp tag
_ replace "Oh man oh jeez" Rick & Morty link
_ Nevada bona fides
_ Parfit's Hitchhiker
_ Yudkowsky's LW moderation policy
far editing tier—
+_ clarify Sarah dropping out of the coordination group
+_ somewhere in dath ilan discussion: putting a wrapper on graphic porn is fine, de-listing Wikipedia articles is not
_ maybe current-year LW would be better if more marginal cases _had_ bounced off because of e.g. sexism
_ footnote to explain that when I'm summarizing a long Discord conversation to taste, I might move things around into "logical" time rather than "real time"; e.g. Yudkowsky's "powerfully relevant" and "but Superman" comments were actually one right after the other; and, e.g., I'm filling in more details that didn't make it into the chat, like innate kung fu
_ re "EY is a fraud": it's a _conditional_ that he can modus tollens if he wants
_ Megan (that poem could easily be about some other entomologist named Megan) ... I'm probably going to cut that §, though
_ David Xu? (Is it OK to name him in his LW account?)
_ afford various medical procedures
+_ Buck? (get the story about Michael being escorted from events)
marketing—
_ Twitter
"but the ideological environment is such that a Harvard biologist/psychologist is afraid to notice blatantly obvious things in the privacy of her own thoughts, that's a really scary situation to be in (insofar as we want society's decisionmakers to be able to notice things so that they can make decisions)",
+In October 2016, I messaged an alumna of my App Academy class of November 2013 (back when App Academy was still cool and let you sleep on the floor if you wanted), effectively asking to consult her expertise on feminism. "Maybe you don't want people like me in your bathroom for the same reason you're annoyed by men's behavior on trains?"
+if [...] wrote her own 10,600 draft Document explaining why she thought [...] is actually a girl, that would be really interesting!—but rather that no one else seemed _interested in having a theory_, as opposed to leaping to institute a social convention that, when challenged, is claimed to have no particular consequences and no particular objective truth conditions, even though it's not clear why there would be moral urgency to implement this convention if it weren't for its consequences.
-In October 2016, I messaged an alumna of my App Academy class of November 2013 (back when App Academy was still cool and let you sleep on the floor if you wanted), effectively asking to consult her expertise on feminism. "Maybe you don't want people like me in your bathroom for the same reason you're annoyed by men's behavior on trains?"
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1634338145016909824 re "malinformation"
+> If we don't have the concept of an attack performed by selectively reporting true information - or, less pleasantly, an attack on the predictable misinferences of people we think less rational than ourselves - the only socially acceptable counter is to say the info is false.
+Blanchard Tweets my blog in Feb and March 2017
+https://twitter.com/BlanchardPhD/status/830580552562524160
+https://twitter.com/BlanchardPhD/status/837846616937750528
\ No newline at end of file
projects / Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git / blobdiff