replace Slate Star links with last Internet Archive version

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / content / 2017 / theres-a-land-that-i-see-or-the-spirit-of-intervention.md

diff --git a/content/2017/theres-a-land-that-i-see-or-the-spirit-of-intervention.md b/content/2017/theres-a-land-that-i-see-or-the-spirit-of-intervention.md
index 899bbdc..742f7de 100644 (file)
--- a/content/2017/theres-a-land-that-i-see-or-the-spirit-of-intervention.md
+++ b/content/2017/theres-a-land-that-i-see-or-the-spirit-of-intervention.md
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ But this is _so crazy_ on _multiple levels_.
 
 Firstly, philosophers since the days of D. Hume have recognized the distinction between _is_ and _ought_, and have identified the [naturalistic fallacy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy) of direct inference from the former to the latter. That there exists a naturalistic explanation for the current state of affairs—and how could there _not_?—doesn't imply _anything_ about that state being good or just or worthy of being preserved.
 
-Secondly, not only does the nature _vs._ nurture dichotomy fail to hold up to basic scrutiny (the question has been compared to asking whether the area of a rectangle is caused more by its length or its width), it also isn't even adequate to the inferential work we tend to expect of it: [not everything biological is immuatable, and not everything social is easy to change.](http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/09/10/society-is-fixed-biology-is-mutable/) (Consider the case of [spelling reform](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English-language_spelling_reform): no one would suggest that the myriad quirks of English orthography are _genetically_ determined, and yet the entirely social difficulties of getting everyone to coordinate on more logical spellings seem insurmountable.)
+Secondly, not only does the nature _vs._ nurture dichotomy fail to hold up to basic scrutiny (the question has been compared to asking whether the area of a rectangle is caused more by its length or its width), it also isn't even adequate to the inferential work we tend to expect of it: [not everything biological is immuatable, and not everything social is easy to change.](http://web.archive.org/web/20200606144056/https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/09/10/society-is-fixed-biology-is-mutable/) (Consider the case of [spelling reform](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English-language_spelling_reform): no one would suggest that the myriad quirks of English orthography are _genetically_ determined, and yet the entirely social difficulties of getting everyone to coordinate on more logical spellings seem insurmountable.)
 
 Maybe [Good Is Dumb](http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GoodIsDumb) doesn't _have_ to be [Truth in Television](http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TruthInTelevision). _I want to make the stupid dream real._ But to _get_ to the good world—whatever you think that is—