pull out the flower-break class again

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / content / 2018 / reply-to-the-unit-of-caring-on-adult-human-females.md

diff --git a/content/2018/reply-to-the-unit-of-caring-on-adult-human-females.md b/content/2018/reply-to-the-unit-of-caring-on-adult-human-females.md
index dd066f3..35cc2de 100644 (file)
--- a/content/2018/reply-to-the-unit-of-caring-on-adult-human-females.md
+++ b/content/2018/reply-to-the-unit-of-caring-on-adult-human-females.md
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Tags: categorization, epistemology, sex differences, The Unit of Caring, termino
 
 The author of the (highly recommended!) Tumblr blog [_The Unit of Caring_ responds to](https://theunitofcaring.tumblr.com/post/171986501376/your-post-on-definition-of-gender-and-woman-and) an anonymous correspondent's observation that trans-exclusionary radical feminists tend to define the word _woman_ as "adult human biological female":
 
-> Oh, yeah, sorry, I've heard that one too though I've yet to find anyone willing to justify it. If you can find anyone explaining why this is a good definition, or even explaining what good properties it has, I'd appreciate it because I did sincerely put in the effort and—uncharitably, it’s as if there’s just 'matches historical use' and 'doesn’t involve any people I consider icky being in my category'.
+> Oh, yeah, sorry, I've heard that one too though I've yet to find anyone willing to justify it. If you can find anyone explaining why this is a good definition, or even explaining what good properties it has, I'd appreciate it because I did sincerely put in the effort and—uncharitably, it's as if there's just 'matches historical use' and 'doesn't involve any people I consider icky being in my category'.
 
 I'm happy to try to help if I can!