check in

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / content / drafts / a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md

diff --git a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
index 182acd4..0007abb 100644 (file)
--- a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
+++ b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
@@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ There's another very important part of the story that would fit around here chro
 
 [TODO: theorizing about on the margin]
 
+[TODO: "Autogenderphilia Is Common"]
+
 [TODO: help from Jessica for "Unnatural Categories"]
 
 [TODO: "out of patience" email]
@@ -593,7 +595,6 @@ the fact that it didn't means that not tracking it can be an effective AI design
 Embedded agency means that the AI shouldn't have to fundamentally reason differently about "rewriting code in some 'external' program" and "rewriting 'my own' code." In that light, it makes sense to regard "have accurate beliefs" as merely a convergent instrumental subgoal, rather than what rationality is about
 
 somehow accuracy seems more fundamental than power or resources ... could that be formalized?
-
 ]