check in
[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / content / drafts / a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
index b736719..43a854f 100644 (file)
@@ -181,3 +181,19 @@ What happens when every sensitive bookish male who thinks [it might be cool to b
 It worked once, right?
 
 (Picture me playing Hermione Granger in a post-Singularity [holonovel](https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Holo-novel_program) adaptation of _Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality_ (Emma Watson having charged me [the standard licensing fee](/2019/Dec/comp/) to use a copy of her body for the occasion): "[We can do anything if we](https://www.hpmor.com/chapter/30) exert arbitrarily large amounts of [interpretive labor](https://acesounderglass.com/2015/06/09/interpretive-labor/)!")
+
+
+
+> An extreme case in point of "handwringing about the Overton Window in fact constituted the Overton Window's implementation"
+OK, now apply that to your Kolomogorov cowardice
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1373004525481598978
+
+
+
+https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ASpGaS3HGEQCbJbjS/eliezer-s-sequences-and-mainstream-academia?commentId=6GD86zE5ucqigErXX
+> The actual real-world consequences of a post like this when people actually read it are what bothers me, and it does feel frustrating because those consequences seem very predictable
+(!!)
+
+http://www.hpmor.com/chapter/47
+https://www.hpmor.com/chapter/97
+> one technique was to look at what _ended up_ happening, assume it was the _intended_ result, and ask who benefited.