check in

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / content / drafts / a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md

diff --git a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
index d628a3e..43a854f 100644 (file)
--- a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
+++ b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
@@ -186,4 +186,14 @@ It worked once, right?
 
 > An extreme case in point of "handwringing about the Overton Window in fact constituted the Overton Window's implementation"
 OK, now apply that to your Kolomogorov cowardice
-https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1373004525481598978
\ No newline at end of file
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1373004525481598978
+
+
+
+https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ASpGaS3HGEQCbJbjS/eliezer-s-sequences-and-mainstream-academia?commentId=6GD86zE5ucqigErXX
+> The actual real-world consequences of a post like this when people actually read it are what bothers me, and it does feel frustrating because those consequences seem very predictable
+(!!)
+
+http://www.hpmor.com/chapter/47
+https://www.hpmor.com/chapter/97
+> one technique was to look at what _ended up_ happening, assume it was the _intended_ result, and ask who benefited.