check in

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / content / drafts / but-im-not-quite-sure-what-that-means-costs-of-nonbinary-gender-as-a-social-technology.md

diff --git a/content/drafts/but-im-not-quite-sure-what-that-means-costs-of-nonbinary-gender-as-a-social-technology.md b/content/drafts/but-im-not-quite-sure-what-that-means-costs-of-nonbinary-gender-as-a-social-technology.md
index d54d9e6..1d5ea17 100644 (file)
--- a/content/drafts/but-im-not-quite-sure-what-that-means-costs-of-nonbinary-gender-as-a-social-technology.md
+++ b/content/drafts/but-im-not-quite-sure-what-that-means-costs-of-nonbinary-gender-as-a-social-technology.md
@@ -21,3 +21,5 @@ Outline—
  * NB is a way to opt-out of stereotypes
  * Signaling catastrophe: if the 5% of androgynous people ID as NB and you're not allowed to refer to their sex in words, does that mean that non-NBs are therefore consenting to being stereotyped?
  * GNC presentation ("a rocker with a nose ring") has the same signaling dynamics, but doesn't trash our ability to talk about sex when relevant
+
+https://majesticequality.wordpress.com/2020/08/08/some-thoughts-on-being-nonbinary/