[The money argument is a good place to start—I agree that money and gender are both "social constructs" in a relevant and sane sense—but there are constraints as to what social constructs are _stable_: cigarettes emerge as prison currency because they _function_ as a store of value. There's a big space of possible currencies, but some of them will be "interpreted as damage and routed around". AGPs as a _third gender_, or unfeminine women (who these days are increasingly coming out as AFAB enby) as a _third gender_ is way more tenable than "AGPs are women."]
[Address the "our social genders should be fully consensual"—what about consent of the modelers in addition to consent of the modeled?]
+
+
+https://www.wheresgeorge.com/
+
+
+Rachel McKinnon documents say she's a woman https://archive.is/PWmOP https://twitter.com/rachelvmckinnon/status/1053633641161678848
+Rachel McKinnon on her opponents making gender-identity https://archive.is/mmhwU
+
+maybe make this angrier—talk about a rape victim being force to describe her accuser as male. You might say, "well, if she wanted to describe her accuser as an elephant, that would be factually incorrect", but there's a reason she doesn't do that
+
+by bringing up rapists, I might be accused of trying to play Ethnic Tension against trans women, but
+
+
+we can expect sex to be fully consensual, because there's a fallback position of no sex if one party doesn't consent:
\ No newline at end of file
projects / Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git / blobdiff