If good and evil aren't arbitrary, but our _understanding_ of good and evil depends on which books we read in what order, and which books we read in what order _does_ seem like an arbitrary historical contingency, then how do we _know_ our sequence of books led us to actually being in the right, when we would have predictably thought otherwise had we encountered the villain's books instead?—how do we break the symmetry? If the villain is at all smart, she should be asking herself the same question.
+And that's how I break the symmetry.
-
-[We each see the other as bulldozing the territory to fit a preconcieved map]
\ No newline at end of file
+[We each see the other as bulldozing the territory to fit a preconcieved map]
projects / Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git / blobdiff