+
+
+OUTLINE OF POINTS TO HIT—
+
+ * ✓ beautiful moral idea of equality
+ * ✓ —makes people believe that group differences are superficial/fake/social
+ * make sure to explicitly explain _why_ this is appealing
+ * ✓ but this is crazy because:
+ * ✓ is does not imply ought
+ * people feel the need to accept the naturalistic fallacy _inference_,
+ but deny the antecedent and perform _modus tollens_—I think it's more
+ tenable to reject the conditional
+ * ✓ social vs. biological isn't even the axis you care about
+ * but, we also assume things are biological/fixed when that's convenient for
+ "minority" things we want to protect (sexual orientation, gender identity)
+ * requiring crazy beliefs in order to be a good person is a drain, a drag, and
+ a tax on sanity
+ * _be specific_ about what's gerrymandered and wrong about "sex diffs
+ real/gender identity not"