memoir: can't leave well enough alone

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / notes / a-hill-of-validity-sections.md

diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
index 6a4a3dc..18142a1 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
+++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ _ giving up on him, don't want to waste any more time, last email
 
 
 With internet available—
+_ my public objection to Yudkowsky's denunciation of NRx https://twitter.com/zackmdavis/status/1164259164819845120
 _ except when it's net bad to have concluded Y: https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/BgEG9RZBtQMLGuqm7/[Error%20communicating%20with%20LW2%20server]/comment/LgLx6AD94c2odFxs4
+_ my history of sniping in Yudkowsky's mentions
 _ comments on "Self-Consciousness wants to make"
 _ Scott vs. Ben on Drowning Children
 _ Ray and D. Xu's comments on "The Incentives"
@@ -90,7 +92,12 @@ _ maybe Kelsey (very briefly, just about her name)?
 _ maybe SK (briefly about his name)? (the memoir might have the opposite problem (too long) from my hostile-shorthand Twitter snipes)
 (maybe don't bother with Michael?)
 
+marketing—
+_ Twitter
+_ Facebook
+_ Less Wrong
 _ should I buy Twitter ads to increase reach??
+_ TheMotte.org
 
 things to bring up in consultation emails—
 _ dropping "and Scott" in Jessica's description of attacking narcissim
@@ -1197,8 +1204,9 @@ If you _don't_ have intent-to-inform, but make sure to never, ever say false thi
 
 bitter comments about rationalists—
 https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/qXwmMkEBLL59NkvYR/the-lesswrong-2018-review-posts-need-at-least-2-nominations/comment/d4RrEizzH85BdCPhE
+https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/tkuknrjYCbaDoZEh5/could-we-solve-this-email-mess-if-we-all-moved-to-paid/comment/ZkreTspP599RBKsi7
+
 
-(If you are silent about your pain, _they'll kill you and say you enjoyed it_.)
 
 ------
 
@@ -1214,6 +1222,9 @@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Norris_facts
 "epistemic hero"
 https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1096769579362115584
 
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1096769579362115584
+> When an epistemic hero seems to believe something crazy, you are often better off questioning "seems to believe" before questioning "crazy", and both should be questioned before shaking your head sadly about the mortal frailty of your heroes.
+
 https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1434906470248636419
 > Anyways, Scott, this is just the usual division of labor in our caliphate: we're both always right, but you cater to the crowd that wants to hear it from somebody too modest to admit that, and I cater to the crowd that wants somebody out of that closet.
 
@@ -1499,3 +1510,4 @@ what's really weird is having a delusion, knowing it's a delusion, and _everyone
 ... and I'm not allowed to say that without drawing on my diplomacy budget, which puts a permanent distance between me and the group
 
 you can't imagine contemporary Yudkowsky adhering to Crocker's rules  (http://sl4.org/crocker.html)
+