check in before redemption

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / notes / a-hill-of-validity-sections.md

diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
index 6919ceb..1e966db 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
+++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 With internet available—
+_ me remarking to "Wilhelm" that I think I met Vanessa at Solstice once, commented on Greg Egan
 _ debate with Benquo and Jessicata
 _ Prudentbot § from "Robust Cooperation" paper
 _ compile Categories references from the Dolphin War Twitter thread
@@ -1484,3 +1485,7 @@ If someone says to me, "You're right, but I can't admit this in public because i
 But we can't even have that, because saying "You're right, but I can't admit this in public" requires _trust_. 
 
 _socially load-bearing_ philosophy mistake.
+
+I currently write "trans woman", two words, as a strategic concession to the shibboleth-detectors of my target audience:[^two-words] I don't want to to _prematurely_ scare off progressive-socialized readers on account of mere orthography, when what I actually have to say is already disturbing enough.)
+
+[^two-words]: For the unfamiliar: the [doctrine here](https://medium.com/@cassiebrighter/please-write-trans-women-as-two-words-487f153444fb) is that "transwoman" is cissexist, because "trans" is properly an adjective indicating a type of woman.