memoir: can't leave well enough alone

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / notes / a-hill-of-validity-sections.md

diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
index fa7c875..18142a1 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
+++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
@@ -4,6 +4,14 @@ _ giving up on him, don't want to waste any more time, last email
 
 
 With internet available—
+_ my public objection to Yudkowsky's denunciation of NRx https://twitter.com/zackmdavis/status/1164259164819845120
+_ except when it's net bad to have concluded Y: https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/BgEG9RZBtQMLGuqm7/[Error%20communicating%20with%20LW2%20server]/comment/LgLx6AD94c2odFxs4
+_ my history of sniping in Yudkowsky's mentions
+_ comments on "Self-Consciousness wants to make"
+_ Scott vs. Ben on Drowning Children
+_ Ray and D. Xu's comments on "The Incentives"
+_ "Causal vs. Social Reality"
+_ elaborate on why I'm not leaking sensitive bits, by explaining what can be inferred by what was and wasn't said in public
 _ what is the dictionary definition of _gestalt_ (maybe link it?)
 _ better examples from "Yes Requires the Possibility of No"
 _ my comment about having changed my mind about "A Fable of Science and Politics"
@@ -25,6 +33,7 @@ _ dath ilan conspiracy references
 
 
 far editing tier—
+_ footnote to explain why I always include the year with the month even though it could be inferred from context
 _ make sure to quote Yudkowsky's LW moderation policy before calling back to it
 _ tie off Anna's plot arc?
 _ explain earlier that my practice of "throw money at things" also applied to my friendship with Anna
@@ -76,13 +85,19 @@ _ Ben/Jessica
 _ Scott
 _ Anna
 _ secret posse member
+_ Katie (pseudonym choice)
 _ Alicorn: about privacy, and for Melkor Glowfic reference link
 _ someone from Alicorner #drama as a hostile prereader (Swimmer?)
 _ maybe Kelsey (very briefly, just about her name)?
 _ maybe SK (briefly about his name)? (the memoir might have the opposite problem (too long) from my hostile-shorthand Twitter snipes)
 (maybe don't bother with Michael?)
 
+marketing—
+_ Twitter
+_ Facebook
+_ Less Wrong
 _ should I buy Twitter ads to increase reach??
+_ TheMotte.org
 
 things to bring up in consultation emails—
 _ dropping "and Scott" in Jessica's description of attacking narcissim
@@ -1189,8 +1204,9 @@ If you _don't_ have intent-to-inform, but make sure to never, ever say false thi
 
 bitter comments about rationalists—
 https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/qXwmMkEBLL59NkvYR/the-lesswrong-2018-review-posts-need-at-least-2-nominations/comment/d4RrEizzH85BdCPhE
+https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/tkuknrjYCbaDoZEh5/could-we-solve-this-email-mess-if-we-all-moved-to-paid/comment/ZkreTspP599RBKsi7
+
 
-(If you are silent about your pain, _they'll kill you and say you enjoyed it_.)
 
 ------
 
@@ -1206,6 +1222,9 @@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Norris_facts
 "epistemic hero"
 https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1096769579362115584
 
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1096769579362115584
+> When an epistemic hero seems to believe something crazy, you are often better off questioning "seems to believe" before questioning "crazy", and both should be questioned before shaking your head sadly about the mortal frailty of your heroes.
+
 https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1434906470248636419
 > Anyways, Scott, this is just the usual division of labor in our caliphate: we're both always right, but you cater to the crowd that wants to hear it from somebody too modest to admit that, and I cater to the crowd that wants somebody out of that closet.
 
@@ -1491,3 +1510,4 @@ what's really weird is having a delusion, knowing it's a delusion, and _everyone
 ... and I'm not allowed to say that without drawing on my diplomacy budget, which puts a permanent distance between me and the group
 
 you can't imagine contemporary Yudkowsky adhering to Crocker's rules  (http://sl4.org/crocker.html)
+