memoir: poke at outline and prose ...

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / notes / a-hill-of-validity-sections.md

diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
index 06d5daa..a7b52d1 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
+++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ _ screenshot Rob's Facebook comment which I link
 _ explain first use of Center for Applied Rationality
 _ erasing agency of Michael's friends, construed as a pawn
 _ Anna thought badmouthing Michael was OK by Michael's standards
+_ chat with "Wilhelm" during March 2019 minor psych episode
+_ explain the adversarial pressure on privacy norms
 
 people to consult before publishing, for feedback or right of objection—
 _ Iceman
@@ -238,6 +240,7 @@ I got a pingback to "Optimized Propaganda" from in an "EDIT 5/21/2021" on https:
 
 https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/02/10/autogenderphilia-is-common-and-not-especially-related-to-transgender/
 
+https://twitter.com/HiFromMichaelV/status/1221771020534788098
 "Rationalism starts with the belief that arguments aren't soldiers, and ends with the belief that soldiers are arguments."
 
 The Eliezer Yudkowsky I remember wrote about [how facts are tightly-woven together in the Great Web of Causality](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/wyyfFfaRar2jEdeQK/entangled-truths-contagious-lies), such that [people who are trying to believe something false have an incentive to invent and spread fake epistemology lessons](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/XTWkjCJScy2GFAgDt/dark-side-epistemology), and about the [high competence threshold that _forces_ correct conclusions](http://sl4.org/archive/0602/13903.html).
@@ -1066,8 +1069,6 @@ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mmHctwkKjpvaQdC3c/what-should-you-change-in-resp
 
 The HEXACO personality model considers "honesty" and "humility" a single factor
 
-I'm not usually—at least, not always—so much of a scrub as to play chess with a pigeon (which shits on the board and then struts around like it's won), or wrestle with a pig (which gets you both dirty, and the pig likes it), or dispute what the Tortise said to Achilles
-
 (You might group things together _on the grounds_ of their similarly positive consequences—that's what words like _good_ do—but that's distinct from choosing _the categorization itself_ because of its consequences.)
 
 —and would be unforgivable if it weren't so _inexplicable_.
@@ -1148,4 +1149,20 @@ The McGongall turning into a cat parody may actually be worth fitting in—McCon
 
  * https://everythingtosaveit.how/case-study-cfar/#attempting-to-erase-the-agency-of-everyone-who-agrees-with-our-position  
 
-Michael on EA suppressing credible criticism https://twitter.com/HiFromMichaelV/status/1559534045914177538
\ No newline at end of file
+Michael on EA suppressing credible criticism https://twitter.com/HiFromMichaelV/status/1559534045914177538
+
+"epistemic hero"
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1096769579362115584
+
+zinger from 93—
+> who present "this empirical claim is inconsistent with the basic tenets of my philosophy" as an argument against the _claim_
+
+reply to my flipping out at Jeff Ladish
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1356493440041684993
+
+We don't believe in privacy 
+> Privacy-related social norms are optimized for obscuring behavior that could be punished if widely known [...] an example of a paradoxical norm that is opposed to enforcement of norms-in-general").
+https://unstableontology.com/2021/04/12/on-commitments-to-anti-normativity/
+
+Sucking up the the Blue Egregore would make sense if you _knew_ that was the critical resource
+https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mmHctwkKjpvaQdC3c/what-should-you-change-in-response-to-an-emergency-and-ai