-near editing tier—
-_ Anna thought badmouthing Michael was OK by Michael's standards, trying to undo
-
-
with internet available—
+_ Quillette link placement in proton concession
+_ did that Reddit comment cite "Kelsey" or "TUOC"?
_ quote from "Kolmogorov complicity" about everything being connected
_ citation/explanation for saying "Peace be unto him"
-_ link "other Harry Potter author"
_ address the "maybe it's good to be called names" point from "Hill" thread
_ quote part of the "Hill" thread emphasizing "it's a policy decision", not just "it's not lying", if there is one besides the "Aristotelian binary" Tweet
_ quote "maybe as a matter of policy" secondary Tweet earlier before quote
_ 2019 Discord discourse with Alicorner
+_ screenshot Rob's Facebook comment which I link
+_ compile Categories references from the Dolphin War
far editing tier—
+_ edit discussion of "anti-trans" side given that I later emphasize that "sides" shouldn't be a thing
+_ clarify why Michael thought Scott was "gaslighting" me, include "beeseech bowels of Christ"
_ the right way to explain how I'm respecting Yudkowsky's privacy
+_ explain the adversarial pressure on privacy norms
+_ first EY contact was asking for public clarification or "I am being silenced" (so Glomarizing over "unsatisfying response" or no response isn't leaking anything Yudkowksy cares about)
_ Nov. 2018 continues thread from Oct. 2016 conversation
_ better explanation of posse formation
_ maybe quote Michael's Nov 2018 texts?
_ clarify existence of a shadow posse member
_ mention Nov. 2018 conversation with Ian somehow
_ Said on Yudkowsky's retreat to Facebook being bad for him
-_ screenshot Rob's Facebook comment which I link
_ explain first use of "rationalist"
_ explain first use of Center for Applied Rationality
_ erasing agency of Michael's friends, construed as a pawn
_ chat with "Wilhelm" during March 2019 minor psych episode
-_ explain the adversarial pressure on privacy norms
-_ first EY contact was asking for public clarification or "I am being silenced" (so Glomarizing over "unsatisfying response" or no response isn't leaking anything Yudkowksy cares about)
_ mention the fact that Anna had always taken a "What You Can't Say" strategy
+_ when to use first _vs. last names
+_ explain why I'm not being charitable in 2018 thread analysis, that at the time, I thought it had to be a mistake
people to consult before publishing, for feedback or right of objection—
_ Anna
_ secret posse member
_ someone from Alicorner #drama as a hostile prereader (Swimmer?)
-_ Kelsey (very briefly, just about her name)
-_ Alicorner email ettiquete question
+_ maybe Kelsey (very briefly, just about her name)?
+_ maybe SK (briefly about his name)?
(probably don't bother with Michael?)
things to bring up in consultation emails—
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mmHctwkKjpvaQdC3c/what-should-you-change-in-response-to-an-emergency-and-ai
I don't think I can use Ben's "Eliza the spambot therapist" analogy because it relies on the "running out the clock" behavior, and I'm Glomarizing
+
+This should be common sense, though
+https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/3szWd8HwWccJb9z5L/the-ea-community-might-be-neglecting-the-value-of
+
+she thought "I'm trans" was an explanation, but then found a better theory that explains the same data—that's what "rationalism" should be—including "That wasn't entirely true!!!!"
+https://somenuanceplease.substack.com/p/actually-i-was-just-crazy-the-whole
+
+sorrow at putting on a bad performance with respect to the discourse norms of the people I'm trying to rescue/convert; I think my hostile shorthand (saying that censorship costs nothing implies some combination "speech isn't useful" and "other people aren't real" is pointing at real patterns, but people who aren't already on my side are not going to be sympathetic)
projects / Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git / blobdiff