check in

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / notes / a-hill-of-validity-sections.md

diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
index d2fc412..cb15c84 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
+++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@ _ Quillette link placement in proton concession
 _ did that Reddit comment cite "Kelsey" or "TUOC"?
 _ quote from "Kolmogorov complicity" about everything being connected
 _ citation/explanation for saying "Peace be unto him"
-_ link "other Harry Potter author"
 _ address the "maybe it's good to be called names" point from "Hill" thread
 _ quote part of the "Hill" thread emphasizing "it's a policy decision", not just "it's not lying", if there is one besides the "Aristotelian binary" Tweet
 _ quote "maybe as a matter of policy" secondary Tweet earlier before quote
 _ 2019 Discord discourse with Alicorner
 _ screenshot Rob's Facebook comment which I link
+_ compile Categories references from the Dolphin War
 
 
 far editing tier—
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ _ erasing agency of Michael's friends, construed as a pawn
 _ chat with "Wilhelm" during March 2019 minor psych episode
 _ mention the fact that Anna had always taken a "What You Can't Say" strategy
 _ when to use first _vs. last names
+_ explain why I'm not being charitable in 2018 thread analysis, that at the time, I thought it had to be a mistake
 
 
 people to consult before publishing, for feedback or right of objection—
@@ -39,8 +40,8 @@ _ Scott
 _ Anna
 _ secret posse member
 _ someone from Alicorner #drama as a hostile prereader (Swimmer?)
-_ Kelsey (very briefly, just about her name)
-_ Alicorner email ettiquete question
+_ maybe Kelsey (very briefly, just about her name)?
+_ maybe SK (briefly about his name)?
 (probably don't bother with Michael?)
 
 things to bring up in consultation emails—
@@ -924,3 +925,11 @@ Sucking up the the Blue Egregore would make sense if you _knew_ that was the cri
 https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mmHctwkKjpvaQdC3c/what-should-you-change-in-response-to-an-emergency-and-ai
 
 I don't think I can use Ben's "Eliza the spambot therapist" analogy because it relies on the "running out the clock" behavior, and I'm Glomarizing 
+
+This should be common sense, though
+https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/3szWd8HwWccJb9z5L/the-ea-community-might-be-neglecting-the-value-of
+
+she thought "I'm trans" was an explanation, but then found a better theory that explains the same data—that's what "rationalism" should be—including "That wasn't entirely true!!!!"
+https://somenuanceplease.substack.com/p/actually-i-was-just-crazy-the-whole
+
+sorrow at putting on a bad performance with respect to the discourse norms of the people I'm trying to rescue/convert; I think my hostile shorthand (saying that censorship costs nothing implies some combination "speech isn't useful" and "other people aren't real" is pointing at real patterns, but people who aren't already on my side are not going to be sympathetic)