check in

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / notes / memoir-sections.md

diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md
index b67b2c6..40e6fee 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/memoir-sections.md
+++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 marked TODO blocks—
+✓ "Why are you a boy?" [pt. 4]
 - social justice and defying threats [pt. 6]
 - Boston [pt. 6]
 - Jessica's experience at MIRI and CfAR [pt. 6]
@@ -32,7 +33,6 @@ _ regrets, wasted time, conclusion [pt. 6]
 not even blocked—
 _ "Even our pollution is beneficial" [pt. 6]
 _ Scott Aaronson on the blockchain of science [pt. 6]
-_ "Why are you a boy?" [pt. 4]
 _ Re: on legitimacy and the entrepreneur; or, continuing the attempt to spread my sociopathic awakening onto Scott [pt. 2 somewhere]
 _ running away to Burlingame; Hamilton tickets
 _ include Wilhelm "Gender Czar" conversation? [pt. 2]
@@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ _ the story of my Feb./Apr. 2017 recent madness [pt. 2]
 it was actually "wander onto the AGI mailing list wanting to build a really big semantic net" (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9HGR5qatMGoz4GhKj/above-average-ai-scientists)
 
 With internet available—
+_ link Scott's comment on the community defending itself
+_ corroborate "Why are you a boy?" date (September 2019, I think)
+_ Nevada bona fides
+_ hate-warp tag
 _ Parfit's Hitchhiker
 _ Heinlein on "Get the facts!"
 _ not-lying Sparashki tag
@@ -99,6 +103,7 @@ _ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yaCwW8nPQeJknbCgf/free-speech-and-triskaidekap
 _ It's not clear anyone he usually respects was making this mistake; it seems likely that the original thread was subtweeting Eric Weinstein, who was not making this mistake
 _ "I Wish You Well" as breakup song
 _ the function of privacy norms is to protect you from people who want to selectively reveal information to hurt you, so it makes sense that I'm particularly careful about Yudkowsky's privacy and not Scott's, because I totally am trying to hurt Yudkowsky (this also protects me from the charge that by granting more privacy to Yudkowsky than Scott, I'm implying that Yudkowsky said something more incriminating; the difference in treatment is about _me_ and my expectations, rather than what they may or may not have said when I tried emailing them); I want it to be clear that I'm attacking him but not betraying him
+_ acknowledge that 
 _ pull "agreeing with Stalin" quote earlier in ms. to argue that Yudkowsky apparently doesn't disagree with my "deliberately ambiguous"
 _ is the title of pt. 4 OK? (agreeing with Stalin _is_ correct when Stalin is right; the problem is that Stalin isn't right about gender)
 _ illustrate "student dysphoria is worse" with anecdote about leaving physics class and going to the counselor to see if I could graduate earlier?