✓ incentives of gatekeeping and system-mandated lies
✓ explain back in the _Overcoming Bias_ era
✓ smooth out "still had his email" callback
+✓ better summary of Littman
+✓ clarify that I'm not a sex work prohibitionist
+✓ Autoheterosexual as secondary literature
_ scan through pt. 1½ and extract highlights to include in pt. 1–6
-_ explain Michael's gaslighting charge, using the "bowels of Christ" language
+_ say more about why omit pt. 1½
_ "Margaret" discussion needs to cover the part where I'd cause less disruption if I transitioned
-_ so embarrassed after the Singularity
+_ explain Michael's gaslighting charge, using the "bowels of Christ" language
+_ the function of privacy norms is to protect you from people who want to selectively reveal information to hurt you, so it makes sense that I'm particularly careful about Yudkowsky's privacy and not Scott's, because I totally am trying to hurt Yudkowsky (this also protects me from the charge that by granting more privacy to Yudkowsky than Scott, I'm implying that Yudkowsky said something more incriminating; the difference in treatment is about _me_ and my expectations, rather than what they may or may not have said when I tried emailing them); I want it to be clear that I'm attacking him but not betraying him
_ mention my "trembling hand" history with secrets, not just that I don't like it
+_ so embarrassed after the Singularity
_ Eric Weinstein, who was not making this mistake
+_ mention HRT pause / stop in pt. 1 end
+------
_ mention "special simulator attention" in cxn with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideas_of_reference_and_delusions_of_reference
_ pt. 1 end needs to mention BABSCon (back referenced)
-_ clarify that I'm not a sex work prohibitionist
_ born five years too early
_ you didn't do a good job explaining to me why someone would think that being bullied into selective silence doesn't constitute a conflict strategy
-_ mention HRT pause / stop in pt. 1 end
_ psych ward vs. psych hospital
_ "A Hill": I claim that I'm not doing much psychologizing because implausible to be simultaenously savvy enough to say this, and naive enough to not be doing so knowingly
_ running away to Burlingame; Hamilton tickets
_ "counterfactual boyfriend"/It's California in the year 2016??
-_ be clearer about dates in "Wilhelm" conversations??
_ "people with fragile identities" dialogue doesn't fit the flow, probably cut or move
_ get exact dates and correct Sequencing on late 2016 conversations
_ mention Michael's influence and South Park recs in late 2016?
_ re Persongen, footnote or sentences about how I knew I was wrong to use naïve-Bayes on facets, but I didn't know what was right
-_ the function of privacy norms is to protect you from people who want to selectively reveal information to hurt you, so it makes sense that I'm particularly careful about Yudkowsky's privacy and not Scott's, because I totally am trying to hurt Yudkowsky (this also protects me from the charge that by granting more privacy to Yudkowsky than Scott, I'm implying that Yudkowsky said something more incriminating; the difference in treatment is about _me_ and my expectations, rather than what they may or may not have said when I tried emailing them); I want it to be clear that I'm attacking him but not betraying him
-_ elaborate on why I'm not leaking sensitive bits, by explaining what can be inferred by what was and wasn't said in public
_ footnote to explain why I always include the year with the month even though it could be inferred from context
-_ clarify why Michael thought Scott was "gaslighting" me, include "beeseech bowels of Christ"
_ address the "maybe it's good to be called names" point from "Hill" thread
-_ explain "court ruling" earlier
-_ Nov. 2018 continues thread from Oct. 2016 conversation
_ better explanation of posse formation
_ explain why I'm not being charitable in 2018 thread analysis, that at the time, I thought it had to be a mistake
-_ better summary of Littman
-_ I should respond to Ziz's charges that my criticism of concept-policing was a form of concept-policing
+
people to consult specifically before pt. 1–3:
_ better explanation of Scott's jailbreaking accusation against Vassar
_ archive.is karma history for Jessica's post
_ "tossed in a bucket" is ignoring advice from Sept. 2022 clarification to be clear about the type distinction
-_ explicitly explain "Hill of Validity" title inversion
_ figure out full timeline of which of my Less Wrong posts to mention
_ update "80,000 words" refs with the near-final wordcount
_ the "outright bad faith" clause in "Your Price for Joining"
-_ secret posse member pointing out that it worked better because it was Oli
+_ "Riley" pointing out that it worked better because it was Oli
+_ I should respond to Ziz's charges that my criticism of concept-policing was a form of concept-policing
_ update "karma at press time"
_ better explain "lie inflation" ambiguity
_ Facing Reality
projects / Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git / blobdiff