_ Tail vs. Bailey / Davis vs. Yudkowsky analogy (new block somewhere)
_ mention that "Not Man for the Categories" keeps getting cited
-first edit pass bookmark: "In an adorable twist"
+first edit pass bookmark: "In June 2019, I made"
pt. 3 edit tier—
✓ fullname Taylor and Hoffman at start of pt. 3
_ ask Sarah about context for "EA Has a Lying Problem"?
✓ set context for Anna on first mention in the post
✓ more specific on "mostly pretty horrifying" and group conversation with the whole house
-_ paragraph to explain the cheerful price bit
-_ cut words from the "Yes Requires" slapfight?
-_ better introduction of Steven Kaas
+✓ cut words from the "Yes Requires" slapfight?
_ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray
_ cut many words from "Social Reality" scuffle
-_ is "long May 2020" link still good?
_ better context on "scam" &c. earlier
_ meeting with Ray
_ Ben's "financial fraud don't inquire as to the conscious motives of the perp" claim may be false
_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to understand what I see as the obvious analogy
_ first mention of Jack G. should introduce him properly
_ link to protest flyer
-_ weird that Kelsey thought the issue was that we were trying to get Yudkowsky to make a statement, which he never does; from our perspective, the issue was that he _had_ made a statement, and it was wrong
+✓ weird that Kelsey thought the issue was that we were trying to get Yudkowsky to make a statement
pt. 4 edit tier—
_ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement)