check in

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / notes / memoir-sections.md

diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md
index 6980c57..96fcc92 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/memoir-sections.md
+++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md
@@ -1,13 +1,3 @@
-pt. 2 near editing tier—
-✓ alphabet bump
-✓ Ziz and Gwen archive
-✓ explain Michael's gaslighting charge
-✓ attacking him but not betraying him
-✓ Ziz chocolate anecdote/history
-✓ I claim that I'm not doing much psychologizing because implausible to be simultaenously savvy enough to say this, and naive enough to not be doing so knowingly
-
-
-------
 _ mention "special simulator attention" in cxn with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideas_of_reference_and_delusions_of_reference
 _ pt. 1 end needs to mention BABSCon (back referenced)
 _ born five years too early
@@ -2668,3 +2658,6 @@ When I mentioned re-reading Moldbug on "ignoble privilege", "Thomas" said that i
 He advised me that if I did find an androgynous woman I was into, I shouldn't treat her as a moral authority. Doing what most sensitive men thought of as equality degenerated into female moral superiority, which wrecks the relationship in a feedback loop of testing and resentment. (Women want to win arguments in the moment, but don't actually want to lead the relationship.) Thus, a strange conclusion: to have an egalitarian heterosexual relationship, the man needs to lead the relationship _into_ equality; a dab of patriarchy works better than none.
 
 https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/should-we-fear-ai-james-w-phillips-and-eliezer-yudkowsky-in-conversation/
+
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1680166329209466881
+> I am increasingly worried about what people start to believe in after they stop believing in Me