smaller TODO blocks—
✓ previous AI milestones [pt. 4]
✓ short timelines and politics [pt. 4]
-_ "victories" weren't comforting [pt. 3]
_ vaccine joke [pt. 4]
_ Scott linked to Kay Brown [pt. 2]
_ posted to /r/gendercritical [pt. 2]
_ the Death With Dignity era [pt. 4]
_ social justice and defying threats [pt. 4]
+_ complicity and friendship [pt. 4]
_ "If Clarity" recap intro [pt. 3]
_ "Agreeing with Stalin" recap intro [pt. 4]
-
bigger blocks—
_ dath ilan and Eliezerfic fight
_ reaction to Ziz
_ psychiatric disaster
With internet available—
+_ May 2019 thread vs. Vanessa
_ historical accuracy of Gallileo
_ explain the "if the world were at stake" _Sword of Good_ reference better
_ a poem I wrote in the _Less Wrong_ comments in 2011
_ pull "agreeing with Stalin" quote earlier in ms. to argue that Yudkowsky apparently doesn't disagree with my "deliberately ambiguous"
_ is the title of pt. 4 OK? (agreeing with Stalin _is_ correct when Stalin is right; the problem is that Stalin isn't right about gender)
_ illustrate "student dysphoria is worse" with anecdote about leaving physics class and going to the counselor to see if I could graduate earlier?
-_ as an author and a critic, I expect to lose status when my critics make good points, and expect to gain status when my criticism makes good points; communism analogy: you wouldn't expect credibly helpful work to be unpaid; and I have to make this kind of analysis even he didn't _say_ "I'm a communist"
_ hate for secrecy probably correlates with autogynephilia blogging
_ mention Said rigor check somewhere, nervousness about Michael's gang being a mini-egregore
_ at some point, speculate on causes of brain damage
_ the "reducing negativity" post does obliquely hint at the regression point being general ("Let's say that the true level of negativity"), does that seriously undermine my thesis, or does it only merit a footnote?
-_ worth footnoting the "some sort of communist" joke?
_ elaborate on why I'm not leaking sensitive bits, by explaining what can be inferred by what was and wasn't said in public
_ footnote on "no one would even consider"
_ post-Christmas conversation should do a better job of capturing the war, that Jessica thinks Scott is Bad for being a psychiatrist
the generic experience is that the future is more capable but less aligned, and we basically expect this to continue
people from the past would envy our refrigeration, vaccines, infinite food, &c., but that doesn't mean they would regard our value-drifted-with-respect-to-them culture as superior
paperclipping is just that turned up to 11 (well, 10¹¹)
+
+Bostrom's apology for an old email—who is this written for?? Why get ahead, when you could just not comment?
projects / Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git / blobdiff