-Said revisions—
-
-"deliberately ambiguous" → "ambiguous for a reason"
-923 words about bad faith
+pt. 4 edit tier—
+✓ "A Fire" § title
+✓ make sure I'm summarizing "policy debates" moral from "Challenges"
+- revise "too good a writer" to be more explicit "someone could be that naive"
+_ footnote about how I could be blamed for being too credulous?
+_ say that explicitly, up front, at the start of that … chunk.
+_ edit post to clarify "nudging the cognition"
+_ Tail's objection to FFS example
+_ Brennan "everyone else should participate" needs more wording adjustments
+_ the mailing list post noted it as a "common sexual fantasy"
+_ Sept. 2020 clarification noted that a distinction should be made between
+_ emphasize that 2018 thread was policing TERF-like pronoun usage, not just disapproving of gender-based pronouns
+_ look for a place to link http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/discursive-warfare-and-faction-formation/
+_ cite more sneers; use a footnote to pack in as many as possible
+_ Stephen Jay Gould
+_ Dawkins and Jerry Coyne and https://www.thefp.com/p/carole-hooven-why-i-left-harvard
+_ parenthetical defending literal fraud?
time-sensitive globals TODOs—
-✓ apply pro edit pt. 4
-✓ section headers for pt. 4
-✓ apply red team pt. 4
-_ rewrite pt. 4
+✓ consult Said
+✓ patriate-links script TODOs
+- remaining pt. 4 edit tier
+- draft #drama strategy opening remarks
_ consult Anna
-_ consult Said
-_ publish pt. 4
+_ #drama strategy session
+_ draft Twitter thread
+_ consult lc?
+_ bully Jeff Ladish
+_ PUBLISH pt. 4!!
+--------
_ finish pt. 5
_ address auto edit tier to pt. 5
✓ consult Tail
-_ bully Jeff Ladish
-_ #drama strategy session
-_ consult lc
_ consult David Xu
_ psychiatric disaster private doc
-
-pt. 4 edit tier—
-✓ "Ideology Is Not the Movement" mentions not misgendering
-✓ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement)
-✓ explain why he could think of some relevant differences
-✓ rephrase "gamete size" discussion to make it clearer that Yudkowsky's proposal also implicitly requires people to be agree about the clustering thing
-✓ honesty and humility, HEXACO
-✓ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links
-✓ ending qualifications on "fraud" and whether it might be a good idea
-✓ selective argumentation that's clearly labeled as such would be fine
-✓ if you only say good things about Republican candidates
-✓ he used to be worthy of trust
----
-_ look for a place to link "Faction formation"
-_ Tail's objection to FFS example
-_ the mailing list post noted it as a "common sexual fantasy"
-_ Sept. 2020 clarification noted that a distinction should be made between
-_ emphasize that 2018 thread was policing TERF-like pronoun usage, not just disapproving of gender-based pronouns
-_ https://cognition.cafe/p/on-lies-and-liars
-_ cite more sneers; use a footnote to pack in as many as possible
-_ Dawkins and Jerry Coyne and https://www.thefp.com/p/carole-hooven-why-i-left-harvard
-
-
pt. 5 edit tier—
✓ sucking Scott's dick is helpful because he's now the main gateway instead of HPMOR
_ Previously-on summary
https://arbital.greaterwrong.com/p/logical_dt/?l=5gc
It even leaked into Big Yud!!! "Counterfactuals were made for humanity, not humanity for counterfactuals."
+Still citing it (13 Feb 24): https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/kSq5qiafd6SqQoJWv/technologies-and-terminology-ai-isn-t-software-it-s-deepware
+
At least I don't have to link the rebuttal myself every time:
https://www.datasecretslox.com/index.php/topic,1553.msg38755.html
https://old.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/10vx6gk/the_categories_were_made_for_man_not_man_for_the/j7k8fjc/
> "arguing about metaphysics is boring; letting people chose pronouns as part of self-expression seems like a thing a free society should allow for the same reason we should let people choose clothes; for many social purposes trans women are in fact empirically women"
(If your "moderately serious" plan for survival is ["AI research journals banned, people violating that ban hunted down with partial effectiveness"](https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1739705063768232070), that might be your least-bad option as a consequentialist, but one of the things your consequentialist calculation should take into account is that you've declared war on people who want to do AI science on Earth.)
+
+public intellectual death
+https://scholars-stage.org/public-intellectuals-have-short-shelf-lives-but-why/
+
+> "Racism" is so commonly used weirdly that I think there are few circumstances left where I'd try to use the word to communicate. Instead I'd say, "X seems to be judging people negatively in a hard-to-shake-off way based on their skin color."
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1755624226550387013
+
+> "Study science, not just me!" is probably the most important piece of advice Ayn Rand should've given her followers and didn't. There's no one human being who ever lived, whose shoulders were broad enough to bear all the weight of a true science with many contributors.
+https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/96TBXaHwLbFyeAxrg/guardians-of-ayn-rand
projects / Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git / blobdiff