check in

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / notes / notes.txt

diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt
index 98df905..f2a4db3 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/notes.txt
+++ b/notes/notes.txt
@@ -3175,3 +3175,10 @@ whereas a straight man needs to be (.68-.36 = 0.32) 0.32/0.12=2.67 more feminine
 In percentile terms, 1-norm.cdf(1) = 0.15 of gay men are as feminine as a woman
 whereas 1-norm.cdf(2.67) = 0.003 of straight men are
 that's a likelihood ratio of 50 ... but the prior is not that far from 50:1 in the other direction! They cancel out!!]
+
+https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/115874/shirley-conran-s-lace-body-slammed-agp-back-in-1982
+
+https://pitt.substack.com/p/headline-when-a-quarter-of-the-class
+
+https://www.reddit.com/r/TheMotte/comments/vlopk0/culture_war_roundup_for_the_week_of_june_27_2022/ieo2jzm/
+> Obsessive, pedantic, Talmudic talk of edge cases, cluster definitions, Bayesian filters or whatever else grey tribe weirdos might get fascinated with only gets in the way of an honest negotiation of a value handshake between majority groups. Not that I believe it would've taken place in a world with zero rationalists, but it's still annoying.