gearing towards finishing it already ...

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / notes / sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-notes.md

diff --git a/notes/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-notes.md b/notes/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-notes.md
index d13c823..60987c7 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-notes.md
+++ b/notes/sexual-dimorphism-in-the-sequences-notes.md
@@ -1,14 +1,28 @@
 Resolved: publish "Sexual Dimorphism" soon as just the first part, the political coda is too hard to finish in a timely manner and will have to be a separate post
 
 TODO for "Sexual Dimorphism"—
+
+And because the brain and body are an integrated system, people's intuitive sense of [which parts are "me"](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/vjmw8tW6wZAtNJMKo/which-parts-are-me) and which parts are "just" "my body" (which can be swapped out without changing who "I" am), may be _much less in touch with reality_ than they'd like to think.
+
+A common theme in female transformation erotica is that sexuality "goes with the body": in these stories, men who have been magically transformed into women, often express positive or negative emotions (depending on the story and the author) about discovering that they're attracted to guys now.
+
+
+_ transformation details matter: accents and homonyms, sexual orientation changing emotions/accent fantasies: https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/wAW4ENCSEHwYbrwtn/other-people-s-procedural-knowledge-gaps/comment/pheakgvLbFndXccXC 
+
 _ morality and culturally-defined values
+
 _ Vassar clapback anecdote
+
 _ playing dumb initials anecdote
-_ AGPs dating each other is the analogue of "Failed Utopia 4-2" (but phrased in a way that's agnostic about 
+
+
+-----
+
 _ EY was right about "men need to think about themselves _as men_"
+_ AGPs dating each other is the analogue of "Failed Utopia 4-2" (but phrased in a way that's agnostic about 
 _ more empathic inference: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/qCsxiojX7BSLuuBgQ/the-super-happy-people-3-8
 _ If I want to stay aligned with women, then figuring out how to do that depends on the facts about actual sex differences; if I want to do the value-exchange suggested in
-_ "people who have sexual fetishes that can't possibly be realized using existing technology [...] like the guy who gets on by entropy decreasing in a closed system" https://qwantz.com/index.php?comic=1049
+
 
 
 
@@ -168,7 +182,7 @@ Men who _fantasize about_ being women, do not particularly rememble actual women
 
 (Where "girls" are the ones with a vagina, breasts, _&c._)
 
-changing emotions/accent fantasies: https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/wAW4ENCSEHwYbrwtn/other-people-s-procedural-knowledge-gaps/comment/pheakgvLbFndXccXC
+
 
 /2017/Feb/a-beacon-through-the-darkness-or-getting-it-right-the-first-time/
 
@@ -505,3 +519,10 @@ You might think,
 
 This comment in particular is really something—
 https://www.reddit.com/r/DrWillPowers/comments/jxh3mz/in_this_thread_help_me_and_this_community_come_up/gd0mytr/
+
+
+> At least, I have a MASSIVE home territory advantage because I can appeal to Eliezer's writings from 10 years ago, and ppl can't say "Eliezer who? He's probably a bad man"
+
+> Makes sense... just don't be shocked if the next frontier is grudging concessions that get compartmentalized
+
+https://www.overcomingbias.com/2021/03/our-default-info-system-status-and-gossip.html
\ No newline at end of file